| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

Summer Reading

Page history last edited by Kathy Proctor 10 years, 9 months ago

Check out my video about summer reading (and having my daughter as a student):  http://goanimate.com/videos/0Lkl8N_YNXco?utm_source=linkshare  

 

 

To comment about your reading experience this summer, you must first log in to your account and then add a comment at the bottom of this page. 

 

http://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi3294271769/

I've been so busy reading my "fun books" this summer that I haven't started my summer reading for school...

 

Students, when you post about the books, you should write a somewhat detailed "response," not just questions about the books.  Tell how you FEEL about the books:  What parts (if any) did you love/hate?  Which characters were your favorite/least favorite?  What lines resonated with you?  Why are these novels considered classics?  What themes are timeless?  Were the novels hard for you to understand? Did you see any similarities in the Bronte sisters' writing styles?  Jane Eyre was well-received when it was first published, but Wuthering Heights was not...why?  Why do you think readers today prefer Wuthering Heights?

 

 

 

Comments (205)

Kathy Proctor said

at 1:57 pm on Jun 28, 2013

Remember to type "SPOILER ALERT" if you are going to say something that reveals the ending or ruins a surprise for other readers who have not finished.

Lindsey Rhyne said

at 12:09 pm on Jun 30, 2013

Are we going to need a hard copy of the books for class? I've just been reading them off of my iPad and wanted to know whether or not I should purchase them

Kathy Proctor said

at 9:46 am on Jul 1, 2013

For the summer reading, you should be fine with the digital books. I have some copies of these books in my classroom if we need them for some reason. Have you finished yet? :)

Kathy Proctor said

at 11:09 am on Jul 13, 2013

I just finished The Art of Racing in the Rain, a wonderful little book that makes me look at our sweet dog Bessie in a new way and that makes me miss our perfect dog Sunshine even more. Now it is time for me to get started on my "serious" summer reading for school. I don't know for sure if I will be teaching Ms. Summerlin''s AP classes, but just in case, I better get started reading The Things They Carried...

Lindsey Rhyne said

at 11:17 am on Jul 13, 2013

In Jane Eyre, why does the author refer to towns with "---"? For example,"---shire" or "S-". And yes, I have finished

Kathy Proctor said

at 11:28 am on Jul 13, 2013

Many people have tried to answer that question, but here is one answer that I think is valid:
This was a common literary convention of the time...
and it provided the authors with several advantages. NOte that it isn't just place names that books of the time period do this with--authors used the same convention for people's names as well --"Lady S informed me that..."

In fact, we have a modern counterpart to this..."The names have been changed to protect the innocent."

In a world where the upper levels of society would more or less all know each other or know about each other, or know someone who knew something about any other person in their social circle, it allowed the author to place people and actions in a general area, without having to get specific. This increases the verisimilditude of the stories AT THE TIME. Jane Eyre runs away from Mr Rochester to an unspecified industrial area, where she is refused work in the needle factory. Any educated person in England would have known where in the country one would be apt to find needle factories, but ensures that no fact-checking must be done, and that the author can't be called upon for inconsistencies that are essentially meaningless to the story.

The Bronte girls also lived a very isolated, circumscribed existence--in short, they didn't get out much at all, and they didn't get to participate in the real world to any great extent. The convention worked to let them create and place their stories more freely, because as long as they were unspecific, the plots held up--again, this convention protected them from nitpicking over architectural, temporal, and geographic inconsistencies.

Kathy Proctor said

at 11:33 am on Jul 13, 2013

I forgot to add the quotation marks when I pasted the explanation above. Basically, it was just something authors did back then, particularly during the Victorian Age. (I have read Dracula, Tess of the d'Urbervilles, and A Tale of Two Cities, and those authors did the same thing. Sort of like "covering their butts" in case any information was wrong.

Jamie Ashby said

at 11:38 am on Jul 15, 2013

why was French such a profound language in this era, it seems like almost all the characters passed chapter 11 speak this language.

Kathy Proctor said

at 12:20 pm on Jul 16, 2013

Ha ha. Most "educated" people had studied French, so it was expected that readers during the Victorian Age would understand the French dialogue. That's not the case today, although when I was in school, most people did take French.

Jamie Ashby said

at 11:39 am on Jul 15, 2013

I'm representing Jane Eyre in the last comment and not Wuthering Heights

Jamie Ashby said

at 12:59 pm on Jul 16, 2013

Was Latin in this hierchary too?

Kathy Proctor said

at 1:05 pm on Jul 16, 2013

Yes, most people studied Latin as well; that is probably why they could understand the vocabulary in these books. :)

Kayla Jackson said

at 8:20 pm on Jul 17, 2013

In Jane Eyre I've noticed that Mr. Rochester uses the term "by-the-bye" quite frequently...what does he mean by that?

Kathy Proctor said

at 11:01 pm on Jul 17, 2013

It is sort of like "by the way" or "as a matter of fact" or "incidentally."

Pearson Futrell said

at 10:10 pm on Jul 18, 2013

In the beginning of Jane Eyre, Jane repeatedly talks about "going to sleep in my crib," isn't she a little too old to sleep in a crib or is that just another name for a bed in the book?

Kathy Proctor said

at 11:15 am on Jul 19, 2013

haha I think that is another name for a bed, but I may have to google it just to be sure.

Kathy Proctor said

at 11:30 am on Jul 19, 2013

Here is a sample response, the kind that I expect you guys to post:
When I first read Wuthering Heights in high school over thirty years ago, it was for an independent reading assignment in 12th grade English. (I will wait to tell you in class why I chose this particular book for my project...) For some reason, I liked the book from the beginning, and I "got" it. That's why it is hard for me to understand why my students get so confused at the beginning of the novel and end up giving up on it. Maybe it was because I had a really mean boyfriend who sort of reminded me of Heathcliff or maybe it was my tendency to pull for the underdog (as Heathcliff certainly is when he first comes to the Earnshaw home), but I loved the story of Cathy and Heathcliff from the beginning. The whole romping around the windswept moors together as children and later as rebellious teenagers spoke to me then, and I loved the book. As an old woman now, I prefer the story of the next generation..Catherine and Hareton. I won't say much about it now for those of you who haven't gotten to that part yet. By the way, if you watch the Timothy Dalton movie instead of reading the book, that generation is completely left out, so you better just read the book. Anyway, I still cannot stand whiny little Linton Heathcliff any more than I did thirty years ago. I wonder what you will think of him...Maybe you will be a bit more sympathetic. I still love the book Wuthering Heights, and now that I have read the Twilight books and Fifty Shades..., I notice many Heathcliff characteristics in other characters. See how reading classic literature can make you smarter? :) Keep reading!

Jamie Ashby said

at 9:25 am on Jul 24, 2013

*SPOILER ALERT*

In chapter 19 of Jane Eyre, the alledged Gyspsy comes and reads Jane's fortune and Jane seems to accept it...but it seems like the events of teaching the bible in almost every single chapter religiously (literally) makes me feel dismay that she would accept this...is she in a weakened state of acceptance and would accept anything into her knowledge/heart or am I missing something?

Kathy Proctor said

at 10:53 pm on Jul 24, 2013

Excellent observation, Jamie. I don't think Jane really accepted the gypsy's predictions, though. She was very skeptical at first, but maybe once the gypsy mentioned things about Jane's feelings toward Rochester, she thought there was some validity. I always thought it was strange that the gypsy was allowed in the house, but I suppose that was a form of entertainment back then, since no one seemed to work and probably needed some entertaining!

ejproctor said

at 6:40 pm on Aug 7, 2013

Why is nature such a common theme throughout Wuthering Heights?

Kathy Proctor said

at 12:17 am on Aug 8, 2013

The elements of storm and calm are supposed to emulate the characters somewhat. So...Wuthering Heights represents "stormy" characters like Heathcliff and Cathy, while Thrushcross Grange is a more peaceful place because of inhabitants like Edgar. Cathy and Heathcliff were happiest when they were outside, romping freely around the moors. They abhorred being forced to stay inside to listen to Joseph's sermons and whatnot.
Also, the Bronte sisters lived in an extremely secluded place, as you may remember from the Bronte lecture I made you listen to in the car a few years ago, so they were very much influenced by their setting...much like the characters in WH. When you go back and re-read the book (ha), you will notice that Bronte uses nature to describe relationships...like Cathy's comparison of her love for Edgar ("foliage in the woods...time will change it" or something like that) and her love for Heathcliff.

Jamie Ashby said

at 9:47 pm on Aug 7, 2013

*SPOILER ALERT*

"I wish I had light hair and fair skin, and was dressed, and behaved as well, and had a chance of being rich as he will be!"- Heathcliff, page 56
My question pertaining to this merely, why is Heathcliff so insecure of himself, also in financial terms besides physical. Is it because he is "foreign" (non-English) or because of the time period this is being taken place in?

Kathy Proctor said

at 12:20 am on Aug 8, 2013

Not so much that he is foreign as that he doesn't fit the "fashionable" definition of handsome in the Victorian Age...blond hair, fair skin, etc. You will probably notice the same thing in Jane Eyre with the character of Rochester.

Maxwell Noonan said

at 12:05 pm on Aug 8, 2013

Do we post our responses here or on the pages labeled with the books?

Kathy Proctor said

at 9:48 am on Aug 9, 2013

Post your responses here.

Maxwell Noonan said

at 12:06 pm on Aug 8, 2013

is this page just for questions?

Kathy Proctor said

at 9:49 am on Aug 9, 2013

No. haha People just keep asking questions. I am hoping that soon everyone will be finished reading and will post responses.

Erin Donehoo said

at 3:34 pm on Aug 8, 2013

[SPOILER ALERT]
Jane Eyre
After reading both books, I can definitely say that I preferred Jane Eyre. At first, I really didn't like it much because of the slow development. When Helen died and the story jumped forward eight years, I really believed it was going to get worse for me. But it didn't. Once Jane arrived at Thornfield, I became very intrigued. The introduction of both Mr. Rochester and Grace Poole as more mysterious characters created a much needed element of suspense. As the relationship between Jane and Mr. Rochester developed and we learned more about Mr. Rochester, I really began to like his character. Something told me there was more to him than the harsh "master" he was portrayed as. However, I did not see his secret coming at all, and it added a whole new element to the novel. I thought it was a very unique plot twist, giving him a deranged wife who he was legally bound to. The next part of the story did not interest me as much, and while I was surprised that Jane found family (fate?) I didn't like the direction the story was heading. However, all at once it seemed, Jane went to find Mr. Rochester and etc. etc. they lived happily ever after. All in all, I enjoyed the story, though I found the ending to be a bit rushed. One of the only things I truly disliked about the book was the use of untranslated French. Maybe it was just the version I had, but there were no translations and I felt lost, especially when it was multiple paragraphs. However, it seems like it didn't affect the story much, so I dealt with it just fine.

Kathy Proctor said

at 9:52 am on Aug 9, 2013

Thanks for your response, Erin. I agree that the part when Jane finds family is not as interesting as the romantic part with Rochester, and no matter how many times I have read the book, I still don't like St. John. As for the French, it was just assumed that educated readers of the time knew French, but it would be helpful if there were footnotes, huh?

ejproctor said

at 8:13 pm on Aug 26, 2013

I agree with Erin; I felt as though the ending was a bit rushed, and left out a lot of small details of Jane's life that could have made the novel a little more interesting. The only part I disagree with of Erin's comment is the French, but that is simply because I could translate it and I liked the edge it gave some of the characters' dialogue.

Kayla Jackson said

at 8:25 pm on Aug 26, 2013

I completely agree with Erin about everything, especially when she said that she did not like the part of the story where Jane leaves Thornfield. Even though the ending was rushed I still really enjoyed the way everything turned out!

Erin Donehoo said

at 3:53 pm on Aug 8, 2013

[SPOILER ALERT]
Wuthering Heights
I don't really feel too passionate about this book. I mean, I didn't HATE it, but it definitely isn't something I will reread. I had a few problems with the story. First, I absolutely hated the character of Joseph, mostly because he truly frustrated me. Every time he showed up, I cringed. I just could not understand the dialect the author decided to give him (due to the fact that he was toothless) Sometimes he would say something that seemed like it may be important, but I had no way of knowing what he said. Another thing I disliked was the characters in general. I honestly couldn't find one character that I actually liked. Whenever I thought I liked someone, they ended up going crazy or dying from an unknown disease. Which leads to my question, What was this disease that everyone died from? They would just get a little sick, go insane, and eventually die. Is it known what disease the author was giving them? I was happy that Catherine ended up with Hareton. He was portrayed as an evil child, but I believe he was just a little misunderstood. I feel like he tried to hard to please Heathcliff, and that led to his violence. Young Linton was different. At first he seemed nice and good, but he became quite mean and crazy in my mind too. I don't know why these characters turned me off as much as they did, but the only character I could find any sympathy for was Hareton. Ultimately the reason I didn't like this book as much was because I did not really like the characters.

Kathy Proctor said

at 9:55 am on Aug 9, 2013

You are right that it is hard to like if a book if we do not connect with any of the characters. I connected with Cathy when I read the book as a teenager (and that is not necessarily a good thing!). The disease many people had back then was called consumption, sort of like tuberculosis. You will learn more about that when we listen to a lecture about the Brontes.

Maxwell Noonan said

at 4:02 pm on Aug 8, 2013

*Spoiler Alert*
Jane Eyre
I will admit, this book was definitely better than i thought it would be. Something about it still didn't really click for me though. I think it was because Jane and her circumstances, especially at first, were just too uneventful. In the early goings it seemed like too much of a "Cinderella" type of story, with the "evil" aunt taking care of her and her rotten cousins. In the section of her life at Lowood, it was particularly uninteresting to me. Even when Helen died, I felt a little bad for Jane, but there wasn't enough of a connection between me as the reader and Helen to really be affected. I did think it would be that way throughout the whole book, but I am glad the story started to pick up after, when she moved to Thornfield. The French threw me off a bit, mostly because I would get hung up trying to figure out what was being said. Other than that, the latter part of the book was really good. I found the whole Jane/ Rochester/ Blanche relationship interesting. My favorite part of the story was the mystery aspect, starting with the fire in Rochester's room, all of his secrets, and his crazy wife. The only thing I kind of disliked about the ending was that I really had no doubt that Jane and Rochester were going to end up married, though Rochester's loss of a hand and sight was an interesting little twist.

Kathy Proctor said

at 9:57 am on Aug 9, 2013

It is interesting how we relate differently to books, Maxwell. I love "Cinderella" stories, but obviously, not everyone does. I agree that the secrets and mysteries added to a story that would have been little more than a romance.

Hayden Vick said

at 12:39 am on Aug 12, 2013

*SPOILER ALERT*
I have to agree with Erin in the sense that Jane Eyre progressed rather slowly. Jane's years at Lowood were rather repetitive and I felt like that part of the book drug on forever. However, after Helen died, the book seemed to immediately speed up and get much more interesting. There are only two things that somewhat turn me off from the book. First, when Adele speaks throughout the book Bronte wrote her dialogue out in French, which was completely understandable, but at some points didn't translate it into English. I guess that meant that we are supposed to figure out what she said through context clues, but that was pretty confusing. Secondly, the use of imagery in Jane Eyre might be the most usage of imagery I have ever seen in one book. Imagery is definitely helpful to readers, but I do think at times Bronte could ease up on it a little bit. Overall though, while Jane Eyre is a fairly long read, it is a pretty good book.

Kathy Proctor said

at 9:59 pm on Aug 13, 2013

You are right, Hayden, that not knowing French can make reading Adele's dialogue frustrating. That is how I feel when reading All the Pretty Horses, which has a lot of Spanish. I guess that is the trend today.

Jamie Ashby said

at 10:33 am on Aug 12, 2013

**Spoiler Alert**

I do agree with Hayden and Erin, but my dispute is a bias. I love stories that progress slowly, because there is probably a revelation of some sorts that reveals further information. The slowness adds to the details to the story and character development. This is evident in the theme of religion in the novel. Throughout this novel I made detailed notes about how many times the centralized theme of God, man or spirit were being brought up; almost every chapter. This them revolves around Jane since the beginning of the novel. In a sense she wants to find her spirituality...The first dose of "religion" that she got was from Mr. Brocklehurst; he was quick to judge, demanding, and was like a fire and brimstone type of man, but understanding the time period it's understandable (even though people are like that today). He was mainly a hypocrite in my eyes, but Jane got the impression that that's what Christianity must portray. While this is happening she sees a complete opposite point of view of God; Helen. When Helen is on her death bed she prays to God not for her but for Jane, this is true Christian selfless love that is with battle with Mr. Brocklehurst's ideals. Later on in the novel when Jane is getting married and the ceremony is being interrupted she prays to God for solace...Chapter 26. So this slowness of speed in the novel adds to the development of Jane as she finds her spiritual guidance and comfort, I believe it was quite brilliant.

Kathy Proctor said

at 10:02 pm on Aug 13, 2013

Amen, Jamie. Insightful observations about spirituality. I think Bronte was definitely trying to convey a message about seeking God's will for our lives and following His desires rather than our own.

Aerial Alston said

at 4:22 pm on Aug 13, 2013

**SPOILER ALERT**

Wuthering Heights

Despite what most of my classmates I've talked to have to say about this book, I actually found it quite intriguing. At first, I was extremely confused as to what was going on (especially in the beginning when Mr. Lockwood visits) and all of the different characters were mixing up during the first few chapters. After I read more and got to the part of the store where Ms. Deans begins to tell the history of the Lintons and Earnshaws, I started to enjoy the book. I didn't like Heathcliff's character at all, after he changed from being picked on by Catherine and Hindley as a child. He was unfathomably evil, and I though he would have a change of heart after losing Catherine, but no. I'm still a little unsure about Catherine Linton's and Heathcliff's deaths. Was childbirth the cause of Catherine's death or was she ill before-hand? The book really gives no details about Heathchilff's death except for Ms. Deans finding him the way she did.

Aerial Alston said

at 5:46 pm on Aug 13, 2013

*SPOILER ALERT*

(Cont.)
As for the other characters, I personally didn't care for Joseph mostly because it was VERY difficult to interpret what he was saying. I had to try to come up with some sort of accent to make his words sound right. Another thing I didn't like about the characters was that they all seemed to be "vexed," with some sort of mental or physical illness, except Hareton and Ms. Deans, and they usually ended up dying. Hindley seemed to had gone mad before his death, along with Catherine. Cousin Linton's illness was never really explained, and he seemed to become rotten like Heathcliff once he made his home at the Heights, so I didn't really care much for him. I can say that I much preferred Cathy marrying Hareton in the end rather than Linton; he seemed to be more grateful for her love. Even though almost all the characters were ill in some way, Wuthering Heights was very easy to visualize in my head, and I did enjoy the book!

Kathy Proctor said

at 10:10 pm on Aug 13, 2013

I love that you used "vexed" in your response, such a good ol' Victorian lit word. :) Catherine had some sort of fever beforehand, and I guess childbirth did her in. (Probably half of the women died during childbirth back then.) Also, as you may recall, when she had her first fever after running outside to find Heathcliff the night he ran away, the doctor warned that she should not be upset or she may get sick again. I guess moods affected physical health a great deal then. Ha

maddybonnabeaux said

at 1:33 pm on Aug 15, 2013

*SPOILER ALERT*
Jane Eyre

I have to agree with Hayden and Erin concerning the slow development of the book. At first, I wondered why the years at Lowood were so dragged out in the first 10 chapters. After I finished the book, however, I felt like it helped me understand Jane as a character. They helped develop Jane's desire for individuality. I noticed the word "fire" throughout the book. Another thing was society/class in the Victorian era. Though Mrs. Reed was obligated to take care of Jane, she neglected her and didn't treat her as one of her own. Also, when Jane arrived at Thornfield, she was relieved to be on the same level as Mrs. Fairfax. I thought it was hypocritical that Jane thought it was somewhat "degrading" to be a school mistress after St. John offered her the job...especially when she was living on the street not too long before. I found some of the words like "fortnight" and "hitherto" to be confusing. At the end of the book, was Bronte disappointed in St. John Rivers? It seemed as if she criticized his decision to go to India. Anyways, the book was a lot better than I thought it would be.

Kathy Proctor said

at 10:31 am on Aug 25, 2013

Excellent observation about the word "fire." I have never thought about its use throughout the novel, but I think you might be on to something!

Brandi Brown said

at 3:47 pm on Aug 15, 2013

I totally agree with Maddy, it was extremely dreadful trying to read the first few chapters where Jane was at Logwood. although it was troubling to start the book. I must say it was very entertaining with the witty Jane Eyre. I've had a wonderful time imagining the scenery of this book

Kathy Proctor said

at 10:32 am on Aug 25, 2013

You sound Victorian with your use of the word "dreadful." :)

Kristin Ewan said

at 2:36 pm on Aug 16, 2013

SPOILER ALERT

I agree with Maddy in that the societal pressures of Victorian England are a common theme in Jane Eyre. And yet, I find it interesting that Bronte was so far ahead in her time in creating the character of Jane Eyre. Jane portrays a rebel of Victorian society. She is a feminist. Some examples of this include her wanting to be financially independent of Mr. Rochester and she does not want to be his “doll”. She also sheds light on harsh societal pressures of Victorian England. Examples of this include people of higher class looking down upon her as a governess and also as a child of a clergyman, her becoming engaged to someone of a much higher class and this being seen as odd, as well as her attempt to find work when there are only available jobs for men. Bronte still cannot escape some of the Victorian stereotypes and continues to carry them into the novel, such as men talk of politics and women are described many times as submissive and docile. However, I think overall throughout the book, Bronte does a great job of shedding light on society in Victorian England and I liked that aspect of her writing and thought it was very interesting Bronte was so far ahead of her time.

Kathy Proctor said

at 10:33 am on Aug 25, 2013

Yes! Jane Eyre is one of the first literary women to speak up for herself; she is sometimes called the first "emancipated woman."

Alex Cauley said

at 11:13 pm on Aug 26, 2013

I completely agree with what you thought of Jane Eyre, Kristin. I felt it fascinating that she was able to find her feminine voice in a time when it was not accepted. I think that may have been one of the things that truly drew me in to Jane and made me attached to her, as a character. Without her strong sense of independence and fiery attitude, I feel this may have become just another boring love story. Jane, however, brought to the table completely different elements that made the story special. The most important I feel of these would have to be her troubled childhood, her sense of pride, and her way of persevering through everything that went wrong in her life. This set the book apart from the rest, for me, and enabled me to become intrigued in the story. Jane Eyre was a feminist before anything of the sort was ever thought of, making her quite a historian in my book.

Zachary Massengill said

at 9:45 pm on Aug 16, 2013

[Spoiler Alert]
Wuthering Heights
Personally i really liked this book. It was easy to read and really got my attention. I really didn't like Heathcliffs character all throughout the book. I didn't like the way he treated the other characters and how he was just using young Catherine and Linton's love just so he could get the Earnshaw fortune. But like Arieal said i would have rather seen Cathy and Edgar together. I also liked Nelly's character because she put up with a lot of stuff while she was working for the families. I like how she helped out with the children and somewhat looked out for them even though sometimes they didn't want the help. Josephs character was very hard for me to understand because of the way his dialogue was presented. What kind of dialogue was it? But other than that i really enjoyed this book. It was really easy to visualize.

Kathy Proctor said

at 10:35 am on Aug 25, 2013

I am glad you didn't find the book difficult. Sometimes people give up too easily after the first chapter. Joseph's dialect is called Yorkshire, and since he was not educated, Bronte was trying to emulate the way he would have sounded...which can be annoying if you are trying to read quickly.

Kaite77 said

at 10:19 pm on Aug 26, 2013

Zach,

I both disagree and agree with you on some of your points. I didn't like Wuthering heights nearly as much as I did Jane Eyre and found it to be a little difficult to read. I definitely preferred Jane Eyre out of the two books. Also, I didn't hate Heathcliffs character entirely, I pitied and somewhat liked his character at both the beginning and end of the book. I did hate how he manipulated people as well like you said about wanting Linton and Catherine to marry so he would have her fortune. Thankfully, in the subnotes at the bottom of my pages in my book they actually translated most of what Joseph said so I didn't have to worry understanding that too much. If I didn't have them, I probably would have misunderstood most of what he said.

Molly Donehoo said

at 10:11 am on Aug 17, 2013

Wuthering Heights:
(Spoiler Alert)

I actually liked this book after I got past the first few chapters. It wasn't really that hard to understand. One of the things I noticed about the book was that ghosts were pretty important, Catherine's to be exact. In the beginning when Mr. Lockwood arrived, he spent the night in an old room. He was scared by a noise outside, and it turned out to be a ghost. I assumed the ghost was Catherine since it said her name. When Heathcliff heard about it, he got upset, I guess since she wouldn't appear for him. Days before Heathcliff dies, he becomes extremely happy. It mentions Catherine too at this point. I think the reason he is happy, and the reason he dies so early, is because Catherine's ghost finally "accepts him". He might finally feel at peace and ready to die because he knows he can be with Catherine.

Something I wondered about in the book is how Hareton ended up so illiterate and stupid. His father was smart, Heathcliff is smart, and even the housekeeper can read, so why can't he? Also, I agree with everyone else on how annoying Joseph was. I just skipped his parts all together because he was so confusing.

I actually liked most of the characters and I think that Heathcliff was just misunderstood and angry most of the time because of Catherine, which is why he was so happy before he died. I think that that was what Heathcliff was really like.

Kathy Proctor said

at 10:37 am on Aug 25, 2013

Hareton grew up uneducated because that was part of Heathcliff's revenge on Hindley. Since Hindley deprived Heathcliff of the lessons Mr. Earnshaw used to let him have with the curate (tutor), Heathcliff wanted to do the same to Hindley's son.

Kendra Fischer said

at 1:44 pm on Aug 18, 2013

Wuthering Heights:
(Spoiler Alert)
I really enjoyed reading this book. At first it was really difficult to get through the chapters because it didn't grab my attention but then it got really interesting. It got to the point where I could read 50 pages at time and still not want to put the book down. I thought this book would be hard to understand but it really wasn't. At some parts it got confusing, for example, when Mr. Lockwood is telling the story but in that story Nelly was telling a story about Isabella's letter and I got a little confused about who was talking. I agree with everyone else who has said something about Joseph being confusing and difficult to understand. I didn't like his character that much. Linton was another character that wasn't my favorite, he whined way too much. My favorite character was the young Catherine and I am glad that she ended up with Hareton since she was forced to marry Linton by Heathcliff in the first place. I like the other characters as well. In the end when Heathcliff dies, I figure he was so happy because he would finally get to be with Catherine and that is all he's wanted all his life. This book was really enjoyable to read and I am glad I got to read it.

Kathy Proctor said

at 10:40 am on Aug 25, 2013

Yay, a positive reaction! I like the young Catherine, too, as she is a combination of both of her parents...not as selfish as her mom but still spirited and gentle and kind like her dad. My favorite is Hareton, though. :) I used to love Heathcliff because os his obsession for Cathy, but Hareton has grown on me over the years.

Phillip Barnes said

at 6:17 pm on Aug 18, 2013

Jane Eyre:
(Spoiler Alert.... I guess)
Although it did progress rather slowly as others have said, I enjoyed this book. Each of the three parts had a story of its own. As in part one seemed to be more of background and it gave you a feel of her writing, part two was like a romance novel with her and Mr. Rochester, and part three revealed how she grew as a person. Also, took me quite some time to realize that the tree splitting in chapter 23 was a symbol of complications in Jane Eyre and Mr. Rochester's relationship.

Kathy Proctor said

at 10:42 am on Aug 25, 2013

Yes, that scene you mentioned can be seen in a symbolic Garden-of-Eden way...It was so perfect when Edward proposed, but then nature (God?) reacted because Edward was doing something morally wrong.

Luke Benton said

at 6:32 pm on Aug 18, 2013

*Spoiler Alert*
Wuthering Heights
I hate to say things that have already been said, but this one was a little difficult to get in to. It started off very confusing with all the different relations being thrown at you at once, and then some of them being corrected by the housekeeper. After they were explained it still took me a while to fully understand all of the relationships. These relationships were key to understanding the book and for them to be confusing didn't seem like a necessary way to start off the book. I did find it hard to want to actually read in the beginning, however, once Catherine and Edgar got together it did pick up and got interesting. I wanted to see how Heathcliff would react. I was expecting him to keep trying to win Catherine back over, instead of the revengeful road that he took. That seems to be the major difference between the two novels. They did seem like a very similar story. The girl falls for the wrong person and then ends up wanting the one that wanted her all along. The twist was how vengeful Heathcliff was after Catherine left him. I'll be honest, I didn't like this book that much but it was interesting.

Brandi Brown said

at 8:42 pm on Aug 18, 2013

*spoiler alert*
Jane Eyre
In Jane Erye, Mr.Rochester met Jane when he was injured and she helped him. Why did he mention to her that he was Mr.Rochester? Also when Mr.Rochester said that Adele may or may not be his in act daughter why did he not ever tell her? Obviously he believed it was his because he kept her even after the fact that Adele's mother betrayed him and broke his heart?

Kristin Ewan said

at 9:03 pm on Aug 18, 2013

Wuthering Heights
I enjoyed the overall plot line of the book, especially the way Bronte delved deep into each character's complex characteristics. I did not like many of the characters in this book. However, the book still made me feel a sympathy towards the characters for their hardships and made me understand why they acted in certain ways. For example, Linton was one of my least favorite characters, because he wanted attention and did not seem to exhibit any kind of remorse for for any bad things he did or any sympathy towards others. However, I understood that he was forced to do many bad things and was extremely ill, as well as was forced to live in a place with awful people. I still wish the characters were more likable, but I did enjoy the book overall.

Erin Donehoo said

at 4:50 pm on Aug 26, 2013

Kristin,
I agree with you completely! I honestly didn't like any of the characters vey much and I really thought that they all were either extremely mean, or extremely whiny. As for Linton, he was also one of the worst. I think why I ended up disliking his character so much is because when he was first introduced, I wanted to like him. And I really thought he had the most potential to be a great character. But, sadly, not long after he entered the story, it became obvious that he was whiny and needy. A lot of the characters turned me off from the book, but his was definitely the biggest let down.

Pearson Futrell said

at 12:56 am on Aug 19, 2013

Wuthering Heights:
(Spoiler Alert)
Personally, this book really surprised me. Throughout the first few chapters I was highly confused about many things. It was extremely difficult to keep up with whom was speaking and whether we were in the past or present. As I would get to a new chapter I would spend the first few minutes reading trying to figure out those exact two things. Thankfully, as I read on I got used to who was who and what was going on at the time. One thing that also frustrated me was I felt as soon as I would start to enjoy a character in the book they would die! The older Catherine, who was my favorite character throughout the beginning of the book, really intrigued me with her "love triangle" with Heathcliff and Edgar and I was looking forward to that continuing on throughout the whole book when all of a sudden, she died! Then went Isabella, and later on Hindley died. Even though I wished Catherine had stayed alive, her daughter, Catherine, filled in quite nicely for her mother. Like mother like daughter, I guess. I really did enjoy reading this book, I just wished it would've progressed a lot smoother and less confusing in the beginning.

Also, I completely agree with everyone's thoughts on Joseph. He was very annoying and spoke nothing but gibberish which inhibited me from understand a word he said throughout the entire book.

Brooke Davis said

at 3:31 pm on Aug 19, 2013

Wuthering Heights:
[Spoiler Alert]

I was surprisingly intrigued with this novel. I loved the format in which it was written, and it was pretty easy for me to follow along with it. I think that young Catherine was my favorite character because she was intelligent, kind, and she knew what she wanted (much like her mother). Nelly was also of a favorite of mine because most of the time she seemed like the only one to have any sense. I have come to a conclusion that in the second generation Heathcliff was trying to force a romance upon young Catherine and Linton because he never got to have a romance with old Catherine. He saw Linton weak and sick and didn't think he would have chance with young Catherine, just like he didn't get to have one with her mother before she married Edgar. I really didn't like Linton anyway, and still don't see why Catherine could tolerate him. Even though he was ill, he was also whiny and rude. My favorite pairing was young Catherine and Hareton because you want them to fall in love, but you don't believe it will happen. I overall wish there was more detail in the later generation. I also identified the theme of revenge. Hindley constantly wanted revenge on Heathcliff, and Heathcliff had it out for Edgar. Overall, I really did enjoy this book.

Luke Benton said

at 10:32 pm on Aug 19, 2013

Jane Eyre
*Spoiler Alert*

I surprisingly started getting into this book. When I first started reading this book, I immediately started to think this was a novel that was boring and difficult to understand and that I wouldn't be able to get interested in, however, I started getting interested when she got to Thornfield. I really got interested in the book when the mysterious noises began to occur. I really wanted to know what was going on and became curious and actually wanted to read it, something I thought I would never say when I got the assignment. This book was definitely better to me than Wuthering Heights. It was much easier to follow than Wuthering Heights. It was complicated to follow but wasn't impossible like I thought the beginning of Wuthering Heights was. I liked the fact that Jane did the right thing and went with Mr. Rochester. I did not like the fact that Jane becomes trapped by St. John. I feel like some relationships now-a-days can be like that, but Jane broke out of it and made the right decision.

Hanan Abdelaziz said

at 8:47 pm on Aug 26, 2013

Luke, I can definitely say I agree with you on the last point you made about Jane taking a stand and doing what she wanted and not what she was told. However when it comes to being interested in the book, I found myself more interested in certain scene then say for instance having something catch my attention for the rest of the book. The beginning fought my attention because I was so depressed by the way Jane was treated as a child. I also enjoyed the scene with Helen Burns, Grace Poole's story, and the wedding scene. After Jane realized that St. John and Diana were her cousins my mind was completely blown. The irony of a poor girl with no relatives growing to work for her cousins really got to me. From that point I was eager to read the rest. And I completely agree about Wuthering Heights!!

meganlunsford said

at 11:11 pm on Aug 19, 2013

Wuthering Heights:

*SPOILER ALERT*

FIRST OF ALL: Joseph's dialogue was incredibly difficult to comprehend and I feel like I may have missed important things because I had absolutely no clue what he was talking about.
Okay, now that I got THAT off my chest...

I found this novel a bit... hard to understand at first. But the more I got into it and the further along the plot began to develop I began to find myself really enjoying it. I noticed that since Nelly was telling the story from her point of view (for the majority of the novel) maybe she painted herself in a better light than she did other characters, perhaps that's why, like Brooke said, she was the one who made the most sense throughout the book. Hindsight is 20/20, you know. I also think that since she was not omniscient, she may not have had as much insight into other characters' emotions and thoughts as the book portrayed. I didn't really like the match of young Catherine and Hareton because I aaaalmost wanted she and Mr. Lockwood to get married. Hareton also annoyed me from the very beginning of the novel. I really liked how Emily Bronte kind of caught you off guard with the timeline and how it caught up to modern times, it was almost like all the events Nelly was describing to Mr. Lockwood seemed so long ago from that point, it was a bit surprising that they had taken place so recently. I really enjoyed this book a lot more than I thought I would.

Daniel Klein said

at 7:33 pm on Aug 26, 2013

I completely agree with you Megan. The story did start of confusing and a little slow. But the more you read the harder I found it to put the book down! I also enjoyed the surprising timeline. It did feel as if all the events had happened years before Nelly told Mr. Lockwood. Although I found That the way Nelly explained the story as pretty truthful. I didn't find cause for her to change the story up at all, And it all sounded pretty sound. but just like you I also enjoyed the book.

Jacob VanLandingham said

at 4:15 pm on Aug 27, 2013

Megan, I totally agree with you about how the timeline of the book was arranged. It was unlike any book I have read and caught me off guard at first but I quickly adjusted. I also found it hard to understand at first as well. It was kind of dull to me and the vocabulary was a tad confusing at times. However, it eventually gained my attention, and I enjoyed the book for the most part.

Amber Hawley said

at 11:20 pm on Aug 20, 2013

Wuthering Heights
*SPOILER ALERT*

I thoroughly enjoyed reading Wuthering Heights. I have to admit, it was difficult to understand all the characters and their relationships with one another and where they reside in the beginning. once I sorted that out, I was rather intrigued by the storyline. I found it very interesting that Nelly was telling the story. Her point of view most likely portrayed her as a hero or a more sympathetic character than she really is. It interested me also that Heathcliff was portrayed as such a romantic and understanding character when he and the late Catherine Linton were young, and as he grew older, he began cynical and rude towards his son and young Catherine Linton. My least favorite character was Linton Heathcliff. I did not enjoy his character attributes. He was very demanding and lazy and whiney. He, in my opinion, was not a god match for Catherine at all. After reading the book and understanding the background of the characters and the town, it amazed me at how much I felt for young Catherine. Even though she was a bit overwhelming and childish, she was my favorite character in the novel. In the beginning, I felt myself getting lost and losing track of what was going on, but in the end, I am pleased with what I read and really enjoyed reading the book.

Kathy Proctor said

at 10:28 am on Aug 25, 2013

You are right, Amber...the characters and relationships are hard to figure out at the beginning...so many have similar family names and whatnot. Linton is my least favorite character, too..always complaining!

Chandler Adams said

at 5:52 pm on Aug 21, 2013

Jane Eyre
*Spoiler Alert*

I enjoyed the book, although I agree with the others in that it was a painfully slow read before plot began to unfold. I was a bit confused when Mr. Mason suddenly appeared at Thornfield, was injured by someone only to find out in later chapters it was his mentally unstable sister and Mr. Rochester's wife that had been hidden at Thornfield. When Mr. Mason prevented the union of Jane and Mr. Rochester because he revealed he was already married to his sister, my heart sank. What was next for Jane? It was as if she lived a life of dissappointment and could not escape. She had finally found someone who viewed her quiet and reserved personallity as an atribute, and understood her independance to be from her tough life experiences. Overall, I grew to appreciate Jane as a character for perservering through all the obstacles she faced through her short life. I admired her leaving Thornfield and trying to start a new life, though she faced even more hardships during that time, she finally found her fortune and family during her journey. In contrast, my least favorite charater was Jane's antagonistic aunt, Mrs. Reed. "...she is not worthy of notice: I do not choose that either you or your sisters should associate with her." Who says that about an innocent child? I find this quote horribly cruel since Jane had no other caregiver. Overall, Jane Eyre was a great book, full of vivid imagery and great detail. A slow start, but a great finish!

Kathy Proctor said

at 10:29 am on Aug 25, 2013

I love that you included a quote!

Luke Benton said

at 8:58 pm on Aug 26, 2013

I agree with you Chandler. The beginning was a very slow read, but it seemed to pick up a lot and really take dramatic turns. The most intriguing part for me was trying to figure out who Mr. Rochester was hiding upstairs. This is what kept me reading through the middle section. I also agree with you on how awful Mrs. Reed treated Jane. I don't understand how anyone could do that to a child, especially one that they have agreed to take in and supposedly treat as a family member.

Lindsey Rhyne said

at 11:34 am on Aug 22, 2013

Both of these books truly surprised me; I did not think that I was going to like either one. But it turns out that they are some of the best books I've read in awhile

Although both of these books are centered around the same theme, love, they were VERYI liked how Jane Eyre was the typical love story with a happy ending

Lindsey Rhyne said

at 11:34 am on Aug 22, 2013

oops... haha didn't mean to post that ^^^

Lindsey Rhyne said

at 11:54 am on Aug 22, 2013

Both of these books truly surprised me; I did not think that I was going to like either one. But it turns out that they are some of the best books I've read in awhile

Although both of these books are centered around the same theme, love, they were VERY different.

Jane Eyre was just the typical love story with a happy ending whereas


Whereas Jane Eyre was the typical love story with a happy ending, Wuthering Heights was just really problematic. You could tell from the beginning that the love Catherine and Heathcliff shared was just set up for failure. Although I did like this book as a whole and how it was written, I could not relate to Catherine at all. I don't understand how she could have been so prideful as to not marry Heathcliff whom she believed to "share the same soul" just because of his low social class.

Lindsey Rhyne said

at 11:55 am on Aug 22, 2013

Omg I'm really struggling with these responses hahah oops

Aerial Alston said

at 9:24 pm on Aug 22, 2013

*SPOILER ALERT*

Jane Eyre is pretty decent so far. When I first looked at it, I highly doubted I'd have the will to not just start it, but finish it. I feel like the beginning of this book is dragged out especially the part about living with Ms. Reed, but I guess it was sort of necessary to keep the rest of the details on track. So far, Helen has been my most favorite character that I can relate to (though I haven't picked out many characters yet). She has a certain mentality about her that I can easily connect with in the sense that she feels as if refraining from doing wrong against others who have wronged you is not the way to go. I also like that she seems wise and very informed about morals even though she is only thirteen years of age. Though I don't like this one as much as I like Wuthering Heights, nor have I gotten into it as much, it is still a good read.

Salam Awamleh said

at 7:01 pm on Aug 26, 2013

Aerial,
I most definetly agree with your response, the beginning was stretched out more than it should have been, especially with Bronte's use of details. I also found it relevant for us as readers to have a better understanding of Jane's past in order for the novel to progress. I also agree on your view about Helen, to me she was an important aspect of Jane's life. Helen was a wise young girl who understood more than most and gave Jane great advice about humiliation and how to deal with people's such as Mrs. Scratcherd. Even though Jane Eyre was difficult to read in the beginning I would have to disagree with you about Wuthering Heights being somewhat better than Jane Eyre because to me it was my favorite of the two.

Lauren Lahnstein said

at 9:44 pm on Aug 22, 2013

Jane Eyre
*Spolier Alert*

Out of both of the books, Jane Eyre was my favorite. I loved how it was your typical love story but with a twist. I would have never thought that it was Mr. Rochester's wife behind all of the strange things happening in the middle of the night at Thornfield, but it made a lot of sense once I found that out. I thought it was strange when Jane and Mr. Rochester confessed their love to one another in chapter 23. I understand that he was just trying to make Jane jealous by making her believe that he was planning on marrying Miss. Ingram but it was as if he didn't show Jane any affection towards her or act like he loved her until she confessed her love to him. For the entire time that Jane and Mr. Rochester knew each other they always had this connection. I never would have thought that when Jane confessed her love to Mr. Rochester that he would have asked her to marry him. Mr. Rochester never acted as if he liked, or even loved, Jane enough to want to marry her. I didn't blame Jane when she left after finding out about Mr. Rochester's wife because I would have done the same thing. I loved the romantic twist at the end because even though they were separated they were brought back together by their love for one another.

Jamie Ashby said

at 8:26 pm on Aug 26, 2013

I totally agree Lauren, this did slide under the category of a romance story, somewhat of a Disney genre. A disparaged girl, development into a women, love interests, sifting out the rest; you get it. I also agree a pun the elaborate scheme to marry Jane, why not just be upfront about it and put a ring on it? But this probably adds to the mystique of Mr. Rochester, probably just the character development Bronte wanted to show the readers.

Dakota Long said

at 10:11 pm on Aug 26, 2013

I agree, I actually enjoyed this book and liked the layout it was written in. There were surprises and twists you wouldn't expect and in a way it all pieces together slowly the more you read into. I also agree with what you said about Rochester trying to make Jane jealous but he showed no affection or love towards her at all until Jane confessed her love to him. It's as if she was treated as a backup plan, maybe more wanted than Ingram but nonetheless a backup plan.

Amber Hawley said

at 10:31 pm on Aug 22, 2013

Jane Eyre
*SPOILER ALERT*

I have to admit, I enjoyed Wuthering Heights a lot more. The beginning of Jane Eyre was so typical. The poor orphan girl was mistreated by her caretaker and wanted to escape, and was finally sent away. It was basically Cinderella. I haven't finished the book yet, but I really enjoy Helen. I love how she is the heroine when Jane arrives at Lowood. Helen is the character that is there when no one else is. I love how in chapter seven, Helen still smiles at Jane when she sees her sort of as a sign of sympathy and understanding, even when the children are instructed to have no communication with her. As I said before, I haven't finished the whole book yet, (I'll get there,) but by the end, I think I'll have a better connection and enjoy it more.

Grace Watkevich said

at 8:16 pm on Aug 26, 2013

Amber, I totally agree with you! Jane Eyre was the typical Cinderella story and the more I got into it, the more I wanted something exciting to happen. Helen was such a sweet little girl, it broke my heart when she died. She always stood by Jane's side, even when things were tough for Jane.

ejproctor said

at 9:12 am on Aug 23, 2013

I am liking Jane Eyre much more than Wuthering Heights; Wuthering Heights was hard for me to comprehend because of all the underlying information in the setting and the tone of characters. The point of view changes were somewhat misleading at times, but it is an extremely well written book. I still don't understand how it made you want to be an english teacher, though. Whatever floats your boat Mom!

Kathy Proctor said

at 10:44 am on Aug 25, 2013

I think you have to be EXTREMELY intelligent to appreciate Wuthering Heights, Sisaroo...and maybe a little emo. Ha

Jacob.Kennedy said

at 10:40 am on Aug 23, 2013

Jane Eyre
Check it; The aspect of church in this book fascinates me. How they use the idea that God is striking Jane down. The aspects of a loving God that is there to help you out is lost. It really shows the ideals of a victorian society and their ideals on church! Also that Jane feels like a lesser and that she isn't good enough bothers me. Jane we come to find out is a very strong willed young woman with a strength and passion to her that is undefined by the people around her! Why couldn't C.Bronte just show this from the beginning? Otherwise, I am glad to say I read this book but it was AWFUL! With love, Jacob

Kathy Proctor said

at 10:47 am on Aug 25, 2013

haha Jacob, this book is supposed to show a little moral, I think: If we follow God's will for our life, we will be rewarded. Remember what Helen tried to teach Jane about accepting harsh conditions in life and let God punish people? Jane just didn't buy into that idea. Later, though, she becomes more like Helen but with spunk. Although she loves Edward, she knows it would be morally wrong to marry him, so she leaves. Later, though, because she did what was "right," she is rewarded. Good ol' Victorian moral. That's why people of the time loved this book and hated that "wicked" book her sister wrote.

Kristin Ewan said

at 9:13 pm on Aug 26, 2013

I agree Jacob! When I was reading Jane Eyre I noticed a lot of references to God in a somewhat negative way. For example the way St. John talks about how Jane must give up her life to spread the Bible, and it seems as though negative things will happen if she doesn't. I understand that for the time period this was probably considered, like Mrs. Proctor said, a moral book, because it showed that if you stay on the right path God will reward you. I also found it interesting that Emily Bronte also included many of these aspects in Wuthering Heights.

Jacob.Kennedy said

at 10:49 am on Aug 23, 2013

Wuthering Height
You have got to be kidding me this book was even worse than Jane Eyre, Mrs. Proctor the Bronte's are currently my least favorite authors of all time. The way I think just didn't match up with this book. The whole beginning with the ghosts and Diaries completely lost me! I love the idea of the super natural but then i was like, "WHAT DOES THIS EVEN MEAN!" But I will admit I do love a good love story and when young lovers come together in holy matrimony it tugs at my heart strings! it kind of reminded me of Romeo and Juliet. Maybe i could be wrong i just tried to relate it to something! Needless to say I enjoyed the ending and that was my only positive about this book! That is all I have to say about that! With love, Jacob

Kathy Proctor said

at 10:48 am on Aug 25, 2013

Grrr

Grace Watkevich said

at 10:56 am on Aug 23, 2013

Jane Eyre
*SPOILER ALERT*

I enjoyed Jane Eyre, but I had to work at it. It was the same old love story where the plain-Jane (pun intended) girl had a troubled past but ended up living happily ever after, and for that reason, it couldn't keep my attention at some parts. It was like a typical Nicholas Sparks novel. I liked the bond that Adèle and Jane had. I feel like Adèle looked up to Jane as a mother figure and really respected her. I thought it was very weird that Mr. Rochester acted liked he loved Ms. Ingram, confessed his love to Jane, but all the while, he was married to Bertha.

Even though I did think it was a typical story, I thought the parts with the fires were interesting. I had always thought it was Grace, just like Jane did, but when it came out that Mr. Rochester's wife was the underlying cause, it made more sense.

I thought it was a good book, it just needed a few twists and turns!

Zachary Massengill said

at 11:38 am on Aug 23, 2013

Jane Eyre
*SPOILER ALERT*
I really enjoyed this book. There are a few things i didn't like about it though. Jane's aunt really bothered me with how she treated Jane so unfairly compared to her cousins. I think her aunt was jealous of who she was and the wealth she had. When Jane got to school at Lowood i liked how Helen took a liking to her even when she was neglected by everyone else. When she got to Thornfeild i really like Ms. Fairfaxs character but after the kissing the with Rochester she made me not like her but i could understand why she got mad considering Mr Rochester was already married to Bertha. I really think he should have handled that situation with with Bertha before he decided to marry Jane because it was somehow probably going to blow up in his face after the fact. When Jane left in the middle of the night from Thornfeild it really annoyed me. Im almost done with the book but so far i really enjoyed it more than wuthering heights but i liked both alot more than i thought i would. and like Grace said i think Jane Eyre could've used a little more twist and turns.

Charles Crosswaite said

at 8:30 am on Aug 27, 2013

I agree with you in that Jane's aunt also got under my skin. I also believe that Rochester should have handled his marital problems with Bertha before moving on to Jane.. It was wrong if him to pursue and in a way lead on, Jane. If he truly loved her he would have taken care of any problems like that beforehand. I too liked Jane Eyre more than Wuthering Heights. All in all Zach, you and I are on the same page.

Jeslyn Wethington said

at 12:45 pm on Aug 23, 2013

"SPOILER ALERT"
Jane Eyre was a good book but I found it much tougher to get interested in than I did so with Wuthering Heights. I felt that in Jane Eyre you could really guess what might would happen next, and it was a lot easier to figure out the plot of the book. I like to read books where I'm surprised at something that happens. I will give Charlotte Bronte props, however, that I was shocked when I found out about the lunatic wife Mr. Rochester had upstairs, but, that was about the only surprise in the book for me. I completely agree with Grace when saying that Jane Eyre could have had some more "twists and turns." I really found St. John's character to be quite intriguing. The mysteriousness he portrayed I found to be quite interesting. I loved how he always had something on his mind, and how passionate he was for his work that he was not willing to sacrifice it even for the love he shared with Miss Oliver. I'm not quite done with Wuthering Heights, but it seems like the sisters both share the desire to write about romance's that always face troubles.

Maxwell Noonan said

at 11:13 pm on Aug 26, 2013

You pretty much hit the nail on the head with Jane Eyre for me. The whole body of the book was rather predictable, right up to the crazy wife part. I feel as if the Bronte sisters almost wrote their books in completely opposite ways, because while I enjoyed the body of Wuthering Heights better, the ending was pretty disappointing. They should have wrote one book together, with Emily writing the body and Charlotte writing the end, and then they might have had a good book throughout.

Nicole Radford said

at 2:05 pm on Aug 23, 2013

Jane Eyre
*SPOILER ALERT*
Although the beginning of this book was a bit slow I really enjoyed the conclusion. I felt sorry for Jane early on in the story because of how her cousins and aunt treated her. I thought that she was continually treated unfairly even as she grew older and lived at the Lowood Institution. It did seem that the way she had grown up helped her to be unafraid of Mr. Rochester's actions and attitude towards her. I was very surprised about Mr. Rochester's lunatic wife that he had hidden from Jane. I understood that he loved Jane and did not want her to leave him but I disliked that he was not honest with her about his former marriage. When Jane discovered that Rochester's wife had died in a fire at Thornfield Hall and that he also had been injured I began to root for him once more. At Jane and Rochester's reunion I began to hope that their former relationship could be revived and I was thrilled when they were finally married. The Bronte sisters seem to have very similar writing styles and both books have similarities because both books are about troubled relationships.

Brandi Brown said

at 2:18 pm on Aug 23, 2013

Wuthering Height
*SpoilerAlert*
This book was very confusing. I could barely keep up with which character was who. I mean is there a reason majority of the people in the book's name started with the letter "H"? I personally like "Jane Eyre" better. With "Wuthering Heights" the story was a story within each other. I didn't really like this book, it was kind of a "dead-end" story,which was very sad and depressing. Every time I would get use to or like a character, it seems as Bronte would kill them off from some deadly disease or just natural causes.it was also somewhat creepy,with the whole ghostly scene towards the beginning of the book.

Nicole Radford said

at 2:27 pm on Aug 23, 2013

Wuthering Heights
*SPOILER ALERT*
I really enjoyed reading Wuthering Heights but some parts in the beginning were slow. I finally became interested in the story when Catherine married Edgar Linton. This caused drama and excitement for the remainder of the novel. When Edgar refused to let Miss Cathy continue to see Linton I was reminded of Romeo and Juliet. The two seemed to be separated because of their family's differences that did not involve the couple. As I continued to read I realized that this was not exactly the case. Edgar wanted to protect his daughter from Heathcliff because he knew how Heathcliff really acted. I was glad that Cathy realized that Hareton was not actually as bad as she thought when she first met him. I thought that she was very hateful when she teased him about his inability to read and I was happy that she offered to help him learn. I thought that the style that the novel was written in was very interesting but also challenging. It was sometimes hard to understand if Nelly was speaking to Mr. Lockwood or if Mr. Lockwood was explaining one of her stories. Overall this was an enjoyable book to read.

Jeslyn Wethington said

at 3:37 pm on Aug 23, 2013

*SPOILER ALERT*
In my opinion, Wuthering Heights was a far better book than Jane Eyre. I loved how there was always a twist when reading so you never really knew what to expect. Heathcliff's character kept me intrigued in finding out what would happen next, although I did not like when he kept Catherine a prisoner in the house until her father died just for his personal revenge. I found it weird how everyone in the two families married within each other however, but I guess that just because in present time that's frowned upon. I loved how in the end Hareton and Catherine fell in love and found it very ironic based off of earlier conflicts between the two. Overall I found this book to be very interesting and pretty easy to read, minus Joseph's broken English, which I didn't understand a word of. The Bronte sisters both have many similarities in their writings!

Kathy Proctor said

at 3:58 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Yes, it is strange to us that so many cousins married, but I guess that was normal back then. :)

Maxwell Noonan said

at 3:51 pm on Aug 23, 2013

Wuthering Heights
*Spoiler Alert*
Overall, I liked Wuthering Heights better than Jane Eyre. I liked the way of storytelling, with the whole narration of a story inside the actual story. I also liked how well you could trace Heathcliff's change from a bullied kid, to a jerk, all the way to revenge crazed psychopath. The whole story progressed at a good pace, so I kept reading easily. My biggest problem with the book was the ending. It was incredibly anti-climactic, especially that up until the last few chapters there was a lot of buildup. When I found out that Nelly's story was actually about a year before Lockwood was hearing it, I was pretty surprised. The hinting at a Lockwood-Catherine romance was also interesting. However, the end was highly disappointing. It all just kind of resolved itself without anything else happening. It makes me wonder why Emily Bronte even included the Lockwood character if it all resolved without him. Jane Eyre had a much better ending, but overall, I found Wuthering Heights more entertaining to read throughout.

Ryan Page said

at 4:07 pm on Aug 23, 2013

I can honestly say Wuthering Heights is not going to go down as one of my favorite books. It was confusing at the beginning which did not help capture my full attention. It made me dread reading it. I caught on as the story progressed however I could never really get into the story. It seemed to drag on as if pointless. I finally found the whole "love story" aspect towards the end of the book. However the characters somewhat intrigued me. Many of them seemed to be two faced and very mysterious. I could never fully grasp on to Heathcliff's thinking until the end of the book. A lot of the book seemed to be pointless details that could have been skipped which made it a boring book. There was really no climax that grabbed my attention and got me wanting to read more. It was a little interesting figuring out how recent Nelly's story was but that's about the only thing that got my attention. I felt like Bronte's style of writing is just one I'm not a fan of. This book is not one I would read for enjoyment.

Luke Benton said

at 9:11 pm on Aug 26, 2013

Ryan, I agree with you. The downfall for this book was the complexity of it which made it a difficult read. If its so difficult that you have to reread a lot of passages, it doesn't make for a very enjoyable book to read in my opinion. If it was simplified and told from one point-of-view and the characters were better explained, this might have been an enjoyable book to read. Although I did actually somewhat understand why Heathcliff was doing what he was doing.

Ryan Page said

at 4:51 pm on Aug 23, 2013

*SPOILER ALERT*
I found Jane Eyre a much easier book to read than Wuthering Heights. The way the story was told was easy to understand and the story itself was much more interesting. I loved the mystery behind Grace Poole (Bertha Mason). That really kept me wanting more, I wanted to know the whole story. I also really enjoyed the religion aspect of the book and how Jane became more of a believer throughout the book with different influences from her childhood friend Helen all the way to her long lost cousin St. John. When it comes down to it, Jane shows that God has always been there and everything happens for a reason. That she believes what He wants to happen will find its way. The fact that the story follows her life and goes from a miserable childhood to a wealthy and happy adulthood really made me enjoy it. I felt as if the characters were more interesting in this book opposed to Wuthering Heights. Charlotte Bronte' does a much better job than her sister in attracting the reader and allowing the reader to really get into the book and feel the characters however I did find similarities as both novels have a large "love" theme. I really enjoyed the book.

Kendra Fischer said

at 11:02 pm on Aug 26, 2013

I definitely agree! Jane Eyre was much easier to understand and more interesting than Wuthering Heights. It took me a couple chapters for the book to grab my attention but it did once Mr. Rochester's bed caught on fire, that started everything. From then on there were twists in the book that you would have never thought of. In the end I was really happy that she went from a miserable childhood to a happy adulthood too and that her and Rochester ended up together!

maddybonnabeaux said

at 9:34 pm on Aug 23, 2013

Wuthering Heights
At the beginning, I was confused with the characters because they were all kind of thrown at me once (for instance, Cathy/Catherine). I looked up a family tree and that helped me a lot. Like others have said, Joseph was hard to understand. I could only decipher fragments of his conversations. The characters weren't easy to relate with. My favorite, however, was young Cathy. I liked the second half of the book better...when young Cathy was born the book got more interesting. Nevertheless, this book was boring to me. In Jane Eyre, the plot grabbed my attention, but in Wuthering Heights, I often lost interest….probably because I disliked the narration style. Wuthering Heights seemed melodramatic while Jane Eyre seemed enigmatic. I think the reason Wuthering Heights wasn’t as widely accepted as Jane Eyre was early on is due to the fact that it has a violent tone. Mr. Rochester was mysterious while Heathcliff had a dark and villainous vibe.

Hannah Honeycutt said

at 11:29 pm on Aug 23, 2013

Wuthering Heights
*spoiler alert*
At the beginning of the book I was extremely confused. It was not at all what i expected. It took me a while to really begin to understand the characters and be able to read between the lines and see their reasoning behind the choices they made. Heathcliff especially became one of my favorite characters. Although he was troubled and only out to take his revenge on the children of the people who had hurt him earlier in life, he was the only character who really kept my interest throughout the whole book. Nelly was another one of my favorite characters. She seems to be tied in some way to every event that happened in the book since she had been there from the beginning when Heathcliff and Catherine were children. She was like the answer key to the book. Wuthering Heights was my favorite out of the books even though it was sometimes hard to understand. I enjoyed this book.

Lauren Lahnstein said

at 7:25 pm on Aug 26, 2013

Hannah,
I completely agree with you when you say that Heathcliff was only out to take revenge on the people who hurt him and their children. I also agree with you when you say that Nelly was tied to everything important that happened in the book. To me it seemed that Heathcliff couldn't get over what happened to him in the past and continued to dwell on it the rest of his life. It was as if he thought his goal in life was to make others pay for what happened to him. Heathcliff was probably my favorite character in the book, along with Nelly.

Hannah Honeycutt said

at 11:49 pm on Aug 23, 2013

Jane Eyre
I really was not looking forward to reading Jane Eyre. Having discussed the story line with a few of my classmates already, I thought i would be bored with the book. However, once i started reading for myself there were actually several surprising plot twists that i hadnt expected. Such as the mysterious laughter when Jane first arrived at Thornfield, the fire in Mr. Rochester's room, and Mr. Mason being stabbed in the arm. These events lead me to believe that something greater would occur. In the end though nothing really happened that was unpredictable. It really was your typical romance novel. Even though it was predictable, i still enjoyed the end of the book when Mr. Rochester was able to see his first born child.

Lauren Lahnstein said

at 12:09 am on Aug 24, 2013

Wuthering Heights
*Spoiler Alert*

I felt like this whole book was based on one character, Heathcliff, and his grudge on trying to get back at everyone who scarred him as he grew up. He didn't fit in with society because he was an orphan so the theme of the book was man vs society. This book was very confusing but once you understand why Heathcliff is the way he is, it makes a lot more sense. It was also so confusing because different characters had the same name. For example: Cathy, Catherine, Edgar Linton, and Linton. I feel like Heathcliff centered his life around Catherine even after she passed. This is why he had so many issues with other characters in this novel. Was his main goal throughout the book to make other people suffer because he was suffering? I felt bad for Heathcliff because he never truly knew how to love anyone because he was isolated from society.

Hannah Honeycutt said

at 4:15 pm on Aug 26, 2013

I feel the same way about Heathcliff being the main focus of the book. He was out for revenge on the people that had hurt him as a child. He got his revenge by making their children suffer. Although Heathcliff was delusional and obsessed with the idea of revenge as well as old Catherine, I still feel sorry for him. If more people would have shown him love as a child he would have grown up a lot differently.

Jamie Ashby said

at 12:21 am on Aug 24, 2013

*Spoiler Alert*

Wuthering Heights

Wuthering Heights....What can I say about this book? Well, I honestly felt like this was the bane of my human existence. This book just seemed to relay over and over and over the same recurring themes. Such as Heathlciff not being accepting to himself. He seemed to just hurt and scar his relationships with other characters throughout the novel, if their names weren't Catherine. Evidently, he centered his life around this dead women; the love of his life, I noticed this style of character development in Jane Eyre also. Since the two writers are sisters I can understand this. I parallel Heathcliff and Catherine, to Jane and Lockwood Manor. Their whole existence of living was to serve this particular element in their lives. I just felt like Heathcliff was deemed as a monster in the novel, which he really was in my opinion. He always tarnished the relationships of the fellow characters in the novel, as stated before. In my humble opinion I would give this book a 3.5 rating out of 5. I would probably reread this book to extrapolate more themes and details.

Molly Donehoo said

at 9:06 am on Aug 24, 2013

Jane Eyre

This book was really boring and there was way too much detail and description in it. I think if Charlotte Bronte had included a lot less detail, the book would've been a lot better. I really didn't like Jane at all, she was annoying and I didn't like the fact that the book was told from her point of view. When things started picking up around the 20th chapter, I was able to stay focused on the book better, but all in all, I liked Wuthering Heights a lot better. I had wished she had gone to India, but I actually think I like her ending with Rochester more.

maddybonnabeaux said

at 5:35 pm on Aug 26, 2013

Molly,
I completely agree with you in the sense that the book developed slowly. The excessive details were unbearable at times. I distinctly recall Jane describing a hall light upon re-entering Thornfield. She talked about how the light shined for a paragraph! This seemed somewhat unnecessary to the plot development. I also hated how the book didn't grab my attention until the 20th chapter, as you mentioned. I have to disagree with you, though--I liked Jane Eyre much better than Wuthering Heights. I felt that in Jane Eyre, the plot twists kept the story interesting. In Wuthering Heights, though, once Edgar got sick, the book got predictable. As Edgar was dying, it would make sense for Heathcliff to rush the marriage between Linton and young Cathy in order to eventually obtain the Grange. It was still an enjoyable book, nonetheless. I really liked its "haunted house" aspect.

Charles Crosswaite said

at 12:55 pm on Aug 24, 2013

Wuthering Heights

I found Wuthering Heights to be a bit dull in comparison to Jane Eyre. The plot was somewhat predictable in that you could see how each character felt quite easily which showed their motives and gave you insight into what each person was thinking. For example with Heathcliff obviously he held anger towards his son which was why he treated him so unjustly and cruelly and showed no affection towards him whatsoever. Heathcliff also loved Catherine more than any character in the book which drove him to despise Edgar and cause conflict between the two. Also the complexity of the relationships, however intentional it may have been, was quite irritating. Trying to figure who everyone's cousin, brother, sister, aunt, and lover was slightly confusing. All in all the book was ok, but not one of my favorites.

Charles Crosswaite said

at 1:17 pm on Aug 24, 2013

Jane Eyre

Jane Eyre was considerably better in my opinion. The way the story and the characters flowed together with a fairly simple plot was a nice change from Wuthering Heights' complex relationships and movement from one scene to another. I also enjoyed Jane Eyre's story in general. Coming from her rough childhood, to distinguished tutor, and then rich heiress it all flowed easily together and wasn't nearly as complicated as the plot of Wuthering Heights which seemed to take roller coaster like twists and turns. The ending of Jane Eyre was a lot happier, which I liked, in comparison to Wuthering Heights because who really likes a deep, dark, depressing feeling at the end of the book? Knowing Jane ended up being happy with Rochester just felt better. This book to me is something I really didn't mind reading and actually wanted to know what happened in the end.

Michael said

at 9:08 pm on Aug 26, 2013

I gotta say that I also loved Jane Eyre the same way. Seeing her grow up in a rough house then end as a rich heiress really made the book worth reading. The ending gave you that sense of satisfaction that the story was ended the way it should be.

Brooke Davis said

at 6:15 pm on Aug 24, 2013

Jane Eyre
[SPOILER ALERT]

Jane Eyre was much harder for me to get into than Wuthering Heights. It was very drawn out and did not catch even the slightest of my interest until the chapters in which she became a governess. The parts I enjoyed reading most were the ones talking about Rochester's secret. I'm one for dramatic plot twists and drama in general. The plot, however, also became predictable as i read on. I was a fan of Jane's integrity and intellect, but there were times in which I questioned her decision making. For example, I didn't understand why she agreed to marry Rochester when he was keeping such a huge secret from her and wouldn't tell her until a year after the wedding . Like Charles said, I do like the overall outlook of the story about her transformation from orphan to heiress. However, this is not a book that I would want to reread.

Caitlyn Patterson said

at 8:24 pm on Aug 26, 2013

Brooke, I completely agree with you! Jane Eyre was a much harder book for me to get into also. I feel like the early part of the book was very predictable and not surprising at all. The book definitely did not catch my attention right away.

Bryana Mitchell said

at 8:39 pm on Aug 26, 2013

Brooke, I agree with you about how interesting the part of Jane Eyre was when she became a governess and the parts talking about Rochester's secret. It was almost like reading a lifetime movie! So dramatic! I also agree that Jane was foolish and naive for taking Rochester's hand in marriage despite all of the unanswered questions. The fact that he kept it for so long after they had been married was unacceptable and the fact that Jane put up with him keeping the secret from her makes her seem very passive unlike her personality earlier on in the book where she seemed to be more headstrong. But for me I would read this book again. I love drama-filled books like this.

Jasmine Jenkins said

at 9:19 pm on Aug 24, 2013

Jane Eyre

In my opinion I feel as if Jane Eyre was much drawn out with the vivid descriptive style of writing Charlotte Brontë used. This made it all the more difficult for me to read and truly enjoy, for Jane's youth was very unfortunate. The story became slightly lively as Jane began working at Thornfield. Truly in all honestly I didn't enjoy the book much at all. I was happy for Jane choosing Rochester, though it was wrong to hide such a secret. Charlotte gave a great ending to a dim book, but there was never much in the story to interest me until it got more towards the end.

Lindsay Perry said

at 11:20 pm on Aug 24, 2013

Jane Eyre:
Out of the two books, Jane Eyre was my favorite. Even though it progressed slowly and was incredibly hard to read, I feel like I had a better understanding of what was going on. Like I said the beginning was very tough and boring to read through but once her life started picking up I felt like it was easier and more interesting to read. I was actually excited when Jane went back to Rochester and stayed with him. Even though Wuthering Heights was a lot easier to read, I still enjoyed Jane Eyre a lot!

Hayden Vick said

at 10:29 pm on Aug 26, 2013

LP,
I totally agree with you when you said that the constant introduction of characters was a bit confusing. I will definitely be making some type of family tree in the near future. Also, you were spot-on when you said that Jane Eyre was the more enjoyable book of the two. As for the difficulty of reading it, it definitely was a hard read. Overall, our opinions on Jane Eyre seem to coincide almost completely with each other.

Chandler Adams said

at 11:23 pm on Aug 24, 2013

Wuthering Heights
*Spoiler Alert*

While starting Wuthering Heights, I found myself in a debacle trying to tackle the seemingly endless introductions of new characters. But, somewhere in the middle of this rather confusing literary classic, I started piecing characters together and making connections. I could not help but notice the Brontë sister's quite similar storylines. Like Jane Eyre, Wuthering Heights focused on a poor orphan whom eventually found his way to a rather large fortune. Heathcliff, like Jane has many conflicts with the Earnshaw children after Mr. Earnshaw passes away, but can confide in a servent for help. This classic also reveals a romantic twist when Catherine takes Edgar Linton's hand in marriage. While I enjoyed Wuthering Heights and the many challenges it offered, Jane Eyre was definatley my favorite of the two books.

Jasmine Jenkins said

at 11:29 pm on Aug 24, 2013

Wuthering Heights
This book would be my favorite if the two. I enjoyed the format in which it was written. Using the idea of the supernatural is what honestly caught my attention the most, but Heathcliff's controlling nature was intense. In the beginning it was a tad confusing to as where the characters were even located. As the story progressed it became easier to comprehend and I began to truly enjoy it. I wouldn't mind reading this book again in the near future.

Hayden Vick said

at 12:30 am on Aug 25, 2013

Wuthering Heights
*SPOILER ALERT*

As I believe is the overall consensus, I found Jane Eyre to be much easier to understand than Wuthering Heights. While I was intrigued with the "story inside a story" aspect, I disliked all of the supernatural occurrences and all of the character confusion that came up. While the constant introduction of new characters could be confusing at times, I enjoyed most of them. I totally agree with Jamie in that Heathcliff constantly ruined his relationships with other characters by way of his own personal issues. However, I, for whatever reason, found Heathcliff to be my favorite character. I was able to vaguely parallel Jane's love for Mr. Rochester with Catherine's love for Heathcliff. Overall, unless reading it over again to completely grasp the total plot and all of the different themes within that plot, I don't think I would ever read this book for pleasure.

meganlunsford said

at 1:04 am on Aug 25, 2013

Jane Eyre
*SPOILER ALERT*

This book was definitely my favorite. Like many others have said, I really liked Helen Burns in the beginning. She was a kind of counter to Jane's erratic personality and was very docile; I believe the two balanced each other out very well. When Helen died, I feel like Jane was once again left with a feeling of loneliness as she had been all her life. These first few chapters bored me almost to tears but once her story began picking up as the governess it began to make more sense and was definitely developing a better plot line. I'm happy with Jane ending up with Rochester, although I feel like since she is such a freedom-seeker, being tied down as such may not be the best idea for her. In those times, it was customary for the wife to be viewed as inferior to the husband, and that is definitely not Jane's style. In general though, I really liked this novel and would probably read it again in the future (except maybe skip the first chapters)

Dakota Long said

at 1:15 am on Aug 25, 2013

Wuthering Heights
Between Jane Eyre and Wuthering Heights, this was my least favorite book. I very much disliked the format it was written in but did like the depth of detail the characters were described in. Nelly was my favorite character as she seemingly tells the tale from her personal experience considering she was actually part of the story itself. Through her narration we slowly learn the reason for the way the characters acted in the beginning of the book and we're lead to a clearer understanding of motives and reasons for the way people acted. Although the way in which the book was written was not my favorite, the book itself was not a terrible read and I can say I enjoyed learning the relations between characters throughout the book.

Dakota Long said

at 1:27 am on Aug 25, 2013

Jane Eyre
*SPOILER ALERT*

This was easily my favorite of the two books. The writing style Charlotte Bronte uses is much easier to comprehend and lead me to a deeper understanding of the book. It was interesting to see the way Jane changed from when she was a child to an adult. My favorite part of the book is learning how the relationship between Jane and Rochester developes. I find it interesting how they meet in the manner they do and develope their relationship as slowly as they do, especially when it is apparent that Jane has feelings for Rochester. Rochester continues to tell Jane of his love for Blanche and that he officially wants to marry her until Jane admits to loving Rochester herself. It baffles me why this was kept a secret so long when Rochester feels the same way. All in all the book was a much easier read, and definitely more interesting than Wuthering Heights.

Dakota Long said

at 1:32 am on Aug 25, 2013

Sorry for the last minute corrections, oops, *develop develops

Rachel Hamblin said

at 11:39 am on Aug 25, 2013

Wuthering Heights and Wuthering Heights
*Spoiler Alert*
I feel as though Jane Eyre was a much easier read as others have said. I found it hard to keep up with the constant introduction of new characters in Wuthering Heights. I noticed many similarities between the writing styles of the Bronte sisters through plot, diction, and the focus on the fire and fireplace. The conflicted love between Catherine and Heathcliff resembled that of Jane and Rochester in my opinion. I knew there was some sort of love connection between Jane and Rochester from the moment they met. If I had to read one over I'd read both. I would read Wuthering Heights again to get a better understanding but I would read Jane Eyre for entertainment. At first I did not like Jane Eyre but midway through I got intrigued and finished the second half in one day. My grandma was a highschool English teacher and assigned both of these books for her students every year. She helped a lot in understanding Wuthering Heights!

Grace Watkevich said

at 11:52 am on Aug 25, 2013

Wuthering Heights
*SPOILER ALERT*

Finally, finished! It took me a while to get through Wuthering Heights, but I seemed to enjoy it more than I did Jane Eyre. As I stated in a previous post, Jane Eyre was more of a typical love story, whereas Wuthering Heights had a bit more depth to it. Even though I thought he was totally psychotic, I really admired the love that Heathcliff had for Catherine. I believe that when Heathcliff forced Catherine's daughter, Catherine (hello, confusing), to stay at Wuthering Heights, he thought that was his only connection back to Catherine, and in some ways it was. I thought it very touching when Catherine died and Heathcliff stood over her and said "Don't ever leave me. Take whatever form you wish - haunt me or drive me mad - just don't ever leave me."

My favorite character was probably Nelly. She watched Catherine grow up and she also got to witness young Catherine grow into a young woman. She was so gentle spirited and she seemed to have a very motherly sense about her. She always knew what to do and say and she always kept things, such as visits from Heathcliff, in confidence.

Chandler Adams said

at 10:17 pm on Aug 26, 2013

I completely agree with you, Grace. Although for me personally, I believe Jane Eyre to be the better book, Wuthering Heights relentlessly kept you guessing with the depth of the plot. Heathcliff's love for Catherine was undeniable, and I believe his resentment led him to force young Catherine to stay at Wuthering Heights. In regards to Nelly, I couldn't help but to compare her to Bessie in Jane Eyre. Nelly and Bessie, both servents, were the people Jane and Heathcliff could confide in. They were indeed motherly figures to these two orphans and instilled confidence within them.

Phillip Barnes said

at 1:00 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Wuthering Heights

It took me forever to finish this book! I had to read parts of it twice to really get an understanding. Heathcliff was a really interesting character to me though. I remember at the beginning of the book, as a child he said he would one day have his, , revenge for the way he was treated. That explains why he was so evil throughout the book, and I feel as if he accomplished his goal by causing so many people pain. My favorite character would have to be Hareton. Maybe not so much at the beginning of the book, but by the end he turned into a swell guy. He formed a nice relationship with Catherine and did better himself by learning to read. I wish Mr. Lockwood was more involved in the book or something because I still don't really know who he is.

Michael said

at 1:26 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Jane Eyre

For a high school student the task of reading Jane Eyre is probably a nightmare. With its complex use of vocabulary and grammar and not to mention the use of the french language it really makes you think, "What the deuce are they talking about?" The first few chapters were indeed slow and it made me want to stop reading the book, but once I got into the center of the story it got more interesting and my curiosity got more intense which made me unable to stop reading. Now that I have completed the book I miss reading it. I might watch the Jane Eyre movie to make me feel better or re read the book again when i'm older.

ParadiseHenson said

at 3:14 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Jane Eyre

I really enjoying the book Jane Eyre. it was really an interesting book I like how they did the plot. Also like how the writer started from her younger years and how it effected her in her older years. I really enjoyed the plot twist from when she fell in love with Mr Rochester to finding out that Mr Rochester has a previous wife Wh has gone mad and was also the cause of the fire in the house earlier in the story. but I am also quite satisfied how the story turned out to be a happy ending because I just love a happy ending most of the time and that in the end Mr Rochester and Jane Eyre got married and have a child

Caitlyn Patterson said

at 3:49 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Jane Eyre

Jane Eyre was a very difficult book for me to get interested in. I found the book more of a "Cinderella story", or a "rags to riches" type story. The parts of the book that really intrigued me were when Jane first went to Lowood School as a child, when she becomes a Governess, and when Mr. Rochester proposes to her.

Bessie was a character that really stood out to me. She seemed like the most compassionate one towards Jane as a child. I really liked how she was always there for Jane and really cared about her. Helen was another character that really stood out to me. The way she reached out to Jane and was extremely kind to her when Mr. Brocklehurst scolded Jane made me glad that Jane found a friend as great as Helen. Helen also depended on God and her faith a lot, and i really liked that too.

All in all, Jane Eyre was a really good book with a really good story line, but I don't think I'll read this book again anytime soon.

Kayla Jackson said

at 5:21 pm on Aug 25, 2013

*Spoiler Alert*
Jane Eyre
Out of both of the books this one was my favorite. I was interested from the beginning and had an immediate bond with Jane. I found the story line very intriguing and never became bored with it. I enjoyed it most when Jane was at Thornfield because of the suspenseful story of Grace Poole (Bertha Mason) and the fascinating love Mr. Rochester and Jane shared. I was genuinely shocked to find out about Rochester's previous marriage to the mad Bertha Mason, although after finding out I was able to make sense of some of my confusion concerning the odd events that had happened (the fire and Jane's vision of a "ghost" ripping apart her veil). After Jane left Thornfield I began to lose interest up until the part when St. John heard the news of his Uncle John's death. After finding that out I predicted that it was Jane's uncle as well and that her and the Rivers's were related. I was very pleased to find out that my prediction was true and also to learn that Mr. Rochester had been looking for her. Though I felt that the ending was rushed I was still delighted with the happy-ever-after finish. Overall, I can truly say that this was one of the best books I have ever had the pleasure of reading.

Jeslyn Wethington said

at 3:08 pm on Aug 26, 2013

I disagree with you Kayla. It seemed as though this book never ended when I was reading it. I was not thoroughly intrigued by any detail in the book other than when Mr. Rochester and Jane confessed their love for each other while walking through the garden. However, I do agree with you in the sense that the best part of the book to read was when Jane was at Thornfield.

Jason Howe said

at 6:49 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Jane Eyre
Overall I thought that this book was okay. I found it to be slow in the beginning and while Jane ran away from Mr. Rochester. I found the page long explanations of how a certain tree looked to be very dragging. However, the book had several twists which kept it somewhat interesting. Especially when Jane and Mr. Rochester were at the alter and we found out that the crazy lady upstairs was his wife. Naturally, as a guy I do not love romance novels so overall I found the book okay.

Jason Howe said

at 7:00 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Wuthering Heights
Heathcliff was far and away my favorite character. Without his character the book would have been just another love story but his character added humor and created several problems throughout the book. The first couple chapters I found very confusing and hard to follow but as the book carried on it became much easier to follow and to understand. Compared to Jane Eyre this was more interesting and enjoyable to read.

Caitlyn Patterson said

at 7:28 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Wuthering Heights
This book was definitely better than Jane Eyre, in my opinion. It wasn't hard at all for me to get hooked on reading it, although, the story inside a story theme was a bit confusing at times. Another confusing thing about this book was Catherine, and her daughter.. Catherine. Some parts of this book were difficult for me to get through (like the first few chapters), but after those I didn't really have a problem with reading it. I finished this book much faster than I finished Jane Eyre, and I found this book a lot more interesting, and less predictable. Not saying Jane Eyre didn't have unpredictable moments (like Mr. Rochester being married to a lady other than Jane while trying to marry Jane), but I feel like Heathcliff's attitude and personality made this book a lot more enjoyable for me to read. I feel like Heathcliff kept me, as the reader, on my toes throughout the book.

Salam Awamleh said

at 7:36 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Jane Eyre

I believe that this book was in fact better then Wuthering Heights due to it being less confusing. However, I felt that it was completely dreadful reading the first few chapters, especially the descriptive details the author included. I did enjoy the different twists that I did not see coming. I was shocked to learn about Mr. Rochester's wife, Bertha and the weird events she took part in but without them I don't think the book would have caught my attention as much. Overall, I was glad to know that the ending was a happy ending and that Jane finally found love after her harsh childhood experiences.

Kendra Fischer said

at 7:58 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Jane Eyre
SPOILER ALERT
This book actually ended up being my favorite of the two. At first I was not interested in it and thought it would be difficult to read. I got hooked on the book once Rochester's bed was set on fire. From there on I couldn't set the book down. From the beginning I knew that Rochester and Jane had a connection and that they would end up together. Even though on their wedding day, Jane found out about Rochester's "secret wife", I thought it would work out and they would still end up together. I think the most shocking part of the book to me was when Jane found out that Rochester was already married and that his wife was insane. Also, that he kept her locked in a room on the third floor. I couldn't believe that she was the one who set the bed on fire, who Jane kept hearing and who ripped apart Jane's wedding veil but now it all makes sense. My least favorite characters I have to say, are the guests that Rochester had over for a couple of weeks. They were all stuck up and thought they were too good to even talk to Jane, especially Blanche Ingram. My favorite characters, obviously, are Jane and Rochester. Through everything they always loved each other. Another character I like is Helen Burns. One of my favorite quotes in the book was said by her. "I am very happy, Jane: and when you hear that I am dead you must be sure and not grieve: there is nothing to grieve about. We all must die one day, and the illness which is removing me is not painful; it is gentle and gradual: my mind is at rest. I leave no one to regret me much: I have only a father: and he is lately married, and will not miss me. By dying young I shall escape great sufferings. I had not qualities or talents to make my way very well in the world: I should have been continually at fault." This quote reveals what kind of person Helen is like and her personality.

Kendra Fischer said

at 8:01 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Jane Eyre Continued
She is very religious, she turns her cheek the other way when people are mean or rude to her because she believes it will all be worth it when she gets to heaven. This also shows that she is very kind and caring but she is also very insecure and doesn't think must of herself. She believes that she would have no talents to offer the world and wouldn't make it but I think that she would. Overall, this book was very good and I would read it again!

Salam Awamleh said

at 8:06 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Wuthering Heights

This book was my least favorite of the two, when I began reading this book I was on the verge of giving up, the introduction of new characters was the most frustrating, as well as the characters going back and forth to Wuthering Heights and the Grange. I constantly had to remind myself who was who and what their relationship was with each other. Personally to me, Nelly was my favorite because the book was written in her point of view and she actually endured this during her life with these people and did not expect to share this story with a complete stranger. My least favorite character was Heathcliff, I felt that he was evil and all about revenge throughout the entire book. Overall, I just felt that this book was depressing and I would love for us to discuss this novel in class for a better understanding for things I might have missed.

Phillip Barnes said

at 2:20 pm on Aug 26, 2013

I totally agree with you about this book being the worse of the two. I feel like we should've made like a family tree and added names every time a new character was introduced. Where I disagree with you, is the favorite character. Hareton is definitely my favorite character because overall I think he had the best personality. Maybe not so much at first but in the end he befriended Catherine and he tried to learn how to read to better himself. Other than that though, we have the same opinion of this book.

Jacob.Kennedy said

at 3:40 pm on Aug 26, 2013

Yes, Phil I totally agree with you on the family tree! The characters were very difficult to get straight! I also agree with you that Hareton because he added the most, "energy" to the book. I think his being an uneducated field worker added a lot to his energy. I think of him like a small town hick who is having his first time in the big city! Hareton also has major heart to learn how to read on his own.

Bryana Mitchell said

at 8:28 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Jane Eyre

I really enjoyed the story. It made me very sad in the beginning reading about how disrespectful Mrs. Reed and all of her children were towards Jane. It made me really resent the Reed family. Also this book was far less confusing than Wuthering Heights. It was sort of scandalous as well and very interesting to read, seeing all of the different hardships that took place in Jane's life. Overall it was a great book and I'm glad that it was a love story and all ended well.

Chandler Adams said

at 9:48 pm on Aug 26, 2013

I totally agree with you, Bryana. I feel as though the first couple of chapters depicted Jane's life to be so harrowing and gloomy, that it reeled me in to continue reading. The Reed family's actions towards Jane immediantly turned me off. I am one to love scandoulous storylines, and Jane Eyre most definitely contained one from her days at Gateshead to her personal life. Though to some it may had been predictable, I personally loved the way the book ended in the union of Rochester and Jane. Overall, I too, believe it was a great book and was somewhat simpler to understand and connect together than Wuthering Heights.

Hanan Abdelaziz said

at 8:38 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Jane Eyre

I have to say Jane Eyre was by far better than Wuthering Heights. For me, it was easier to comprehend. At the beginning of the story novel, I found myself attached to Jane's depressing story of child abuse and neglect. They were all so mean to her. I can't say I blame her for lashing out at John, who I wasn't sad to see go. Her character was so intriguing because she seemed like such a rebel at the beginning but grow into a respectable teacher and governess. I feel like she favored Adele because she was in a way a lot like herself. Neither Jane nor Adele had relatives and they both received attention only from their nurses. Towards to end, I was anxious to see if she ever reunited with Mr. Rochester. I definitely didn't want her to marry her cousin. All of the excessive details seemed to make the story drag but overall I enjoyed reading it.

Hanan Abdelaziz said

at 8:52 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Wuthering Heights

The first page of a book is supposed to grab your attention. This book did far from that to me. I, honestly, read the first page, closed the book, and went on to read Jane Eyre. The family tree was quite confusing. I had to draw it out a couple of times before I could proceed reading. Also, the way the stories narrators changed made it hard to follow at times. Heathcliff was my favorite character because everyone saw him as an animal but he was more passionate than any of the other characters. Linton was just annoying in my opinion. I liked Catherine's determination to get what she wants but she was so determined that she drove herself to her death which was absurd. Could you technically blame Ellen Dean for her death as well? Catherine had repeatedly asked Ellen to tell Linton that she was sick so he can com running to her side but Ellen preferred teaching Catherine a lesson and refused to tell him then told Catherine that he'd been reading while she was sick leading to Catherine's rage. I think Ellen was a sneaky little one.

Hunter Cockrell said

at 8:57 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Wuthering Heights

Bryana Mitchell said

at 8:57 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Wuthering Heights

This book confused me immensely! It was very interesting though with all that happened and the deaths and marriages, but only after you could understand what was really happening. There was so much trickery and scandal in this book as well as Jane Eyre which is why I found it so interesting. Although it took a lot to get past all the language and different marriages and past and present changes it was a decent book overall but definitely not better than Jane Eyre.

Brooke Davis said

at 5:45 pm on Aug 26, 2013

Bryana, I completely agree on how confusing the relationships were especially considering the fact that there were two different generations with a mother and daughter having the same name! I admit I was confused a lot too when reading. I also agree with you on how the only thing that made the books interesting were the scandals. However, I personally like Wuthering Heights better because there is more scandal and alot more revengeful characters. Jane Eyre was more of a self discovery kind of novel and a love story.

Maggie Daynes said

at 4:09 pm on Aug 27, 2013

At the beginning when the characters were being introduced, I couldn't keep anyone straight. I'd say that's a problem with the novel, because I feel like I didn't get the full effect of the story because I didn't know who anyone was.

Brandi Brown said

at 6:28 pm on Aug 26, 2013

I definitely agree with you Bryana. Although it was quite troubling starting, and understanding the book, I thoroughly enjoyed it. By far, I as well agree that Jane Eyre was a better read. It had multiple different sceneries, and had more of a mystery plot to it rather than the plain " stick in the mud" Wuthering Heights.

Jaspreet Pooni said

at 6:43 pm on Aug 26, 2013

Very well put, Brandi, I liked Jane Eyre a lot better than Wuthering Heights as well. They were both exceptionally outstanding books, but you hit the mark when you staid that Jane Eyre's different sceneries made it stand out more.

Hunter Cockrell said

at 9:08 pm on Aug 25, 2013

whoops! Wuthering Heights

Wuthering Heights was easily my favorite of the two novels. The manipulative, sinister, and well planned actions of Heathcliff excited me and made me want to read more. Although the novel was complex, I enjoyed embracing the challenge. Heathcliff truly made the novel worth reading for me. His compassion and drive towards the things he loved were respectable even though he was mad. The novel just seemedto have more and more twist, and constantly kept me guessing. I enjoyed Nelly as a character as well. It seemed like whenever Catherine needed her she was there.

Hunter Cockrell said

at 9:23 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Jane Eyre

I found this novel to be much easier to understand, but I did not enjoy reading it as much as Wuthering Heights. The story had complex diction and excessive detail. I found it to be quite predictable in the sense that I foreshadowed Rochester and Jane being together all along. Bertha did throw in some unexpected twist, but even this was not enough to deter the book from away from being a "typical romance novel." I respected Jane because I considered her to be an underdog due to her mistreatment early in the novel. The novel took forever, but all in all was not a bad read.

ejproctor said

at 9:34 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Jane Eyre

I found the story line of Jane Eyre was very predictable due to it being a stereotypical romance novel, but the dialect and time period is what made it interesting. The way Jane and Mr. Rochester would converse and approach each other is so different in comparison to how we conduct ourselves today, and it gave me a clearer understanding of the time period in which the novel was written. The novel was very long, but an easy read in my opinion and my favored of the two.

Jaspreet Pooni said

at 9:46 pm on Aug 25, 2013

*SPOILER ALERT*
Jane Eyre
When asking those who have previously read Jane Eyre what they thought of it, the most common response was that it was incredibly dull and repetative. Hearing this response over and over had me dreading the fact that i had to read it. However, as i got deeper into it and the life of Jane Eyre, I began to enjoy it. I looked forward to unveiling the mystery of Grace Poole and her supposed murderous intents and the blossoming of Mr. Rochester's love for Jane. I was really content with the way it ended. Although both Jane and Mr. Rochester seemed to have been put through un-necessary anguish, i believe that if Jane had stayed the first time, her joy would have lasted for only a few years as opposed to the rest of her life as it did in the end. After reading both books, i realized that Jane Eyre was my favorite.

ParadiseHenson said

at 4:59 pm on Aug 26, 2013

Jaspreet,

I agree with you and I also love how you appreciate the love of Jane and Mr. Rochester. When I was reading this book I come so in love with the mystery of Grace Poole. And when the mystery was revealed I started to like the book even more. Your insight on this story is good.

Kayla Jackson said

at 9:53 pm on Aug 25, 2013

*Spoiler Alert*
Wuthering Heights
Even though I preferred Jane Eyre over Wuthering Heights I still enjoyed this book. The beginning was really hard for me to understand and it wasn't until Nelly began to tell her story when I started to understand what was going on. I was very interested in the story that Nelly told although sometimes it got a little bit hard to comprehend. What made it difficult for me was keeping up with all the characters and their relations to one another. In the beginning I really liked Heathcliff and felt sorry for him because of the way Hindley treated him. As the book progressed I began to have a strong dislike towards Heathcliff as well. I felt both men were cruel and major turnoffs in the book. I liked Catherine from the beginning because of her and Heathcliff's relationship and when she stayed at Thrushcross Grange to recover with the Linton's that is when I started to not like her as much. I strongly disliked how she chose social ranking over her true love and I definitely feel like a lot of the hatred and revenge could have been avoided if she would have chosen Heathcliff. There wasn't a particular character that I really had an interest in but out of them all I would say Nelly was my favorite. I felt like she did a good job portraying all the characters and I liked how she told the story through her own experience. Though I didn't feel like the book was bad it is still something I don't see myself reading again.

Pearson Futrell said

at 7:05 pm on Aug 26, 2013

I completely agree with you when you said your opinion on Heathcliff changed throughout the book. I also felt sorry for him in the beginning but as I kept reading I began to hate how bitter he was towards all the other characters in the book.

Jaspreet Pooni said

at 9:55 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Wuthering Height
Wuthering Heights was really confusing to me at first, but as i got deeper into it, i started being able to distinguish all of the characters. I really liked it because of it's unpredictability and because of it's romantic aspects. Heathcliff was my favorite character because the love he had for Catherine was so strong he found that, after her death, his only solace would be death as well so that he could once again be reunited with her. Overall this book ended up being really depressing, but i feel like that is what caused the ending to be so hopeful.

Jasmine Jenkins said

at 8:07 pm on Aug 26, 2013

I agree with you as well Jaspreet. The book was jumbled but over time became clear. With the main focus always being the true love Heathcliff had for Catherine. I don't believe anyone from the outside would understand how deeply he loved her. This causing the ending to be sad due to Heathcliff dying, but yet joyous for you know now he will be with his Catherine again.

Michael said

at 10:16 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Wuthering Heights

Compared to Jane Eyre Wuthering Heights is probably the most complex of the two books, but its plot is a lot more enjoyable in my opinion than Jane Eyre. Heathcliff's manipulative personality is probably the reason why I wanted to read it more. It made me want to know what is he going to do next and so I kept on reading. Wuthering Heights to me was fast paced and from the very first chapter my attention was grabbed unlike in Jane Eyre when it took forever to finally enjoy the book. Wuthering Heights is a thrill ride filled with twist and turns which makes it an excellent read regardless of the complex language.

Molly Donehoo said

at 4:54 pm on Aug 26, 2013

I definitely agree with you when you say the plot was more enjoyable than Jane Eyre. It seems like it took only a few chapters to get to the story, while Jane Eyre took forever. Wuthering Heights had a lot less detail, I noticed. However, I liked Heathcliff, but not for his manipulative personality.

Daniel Klein said

at 10:19 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Wuthering Heights
Wuthering Heights was a wonderful book! while it was confusing at the start I began to get the hang of the writing style and even began to enjoy it! My favorite Character was Linton, He was a stereotypical adolescent boy when we first meet him, but grew up to be loving father and caring husband. What I found frustrating about the book was the space in between the major events in the story. I felt that the author used a lot of unnecessary description of the surroundings as kind of a filler, and while it did help paint a vivid picture of the setting, it became boring. But overall my favorite of the two books!!

Thomas Smith said

at 10:20 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Jane Eyre

Jane Eyre was by far my favorite of the two. Although predictable for the most part, the book flowed smoothly and was easy to understand. The plot started off well and was direct. It told who each character was and described them in a few words as well. My favorite character in the novel was Mr. Rochester. He was sort of a mystery until climax of the novel. He was hard to read and I never knew what kind of mood he was in. As the plot unraveled, all the truths came out about him and he was “solved.” He kept the book interesting with his mind games and his past that haunted him.

Thomas Smith said

at 10:22 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Wuthering Heights

Wuthering Heights was a difficult read. It seemed to be extremely jumpy and failed to fully develop some of the minor characters that appeared often in the novel. The books introduction was shaky. As I read the first ten pages I instantly had to reread them in order to make sense of what was going on. The story began to clear up as the narrator approached present day events. I did not enjoy reading this as much as I did Jane Eyre. I could tell that the reader was supposed to feel as though they were a part of the story and enjoy the thrill of what was going on. However, this did not happen to me and I became stressed while reading the novel because it was so fast paced and confusing,

Ryan Page said

at 4:43 pm on Aug 26, 2013

I completely agree with you on this Thomas. The book was difficult to read. The characters were all hard to truly develop a complete idea of how they thought and felt based on what the book gave you. It was very hard to really get into the book and stressful trying to keep up with the story and characters. For myself it was even more stressful trying to stay awake while I read

Daniel Klein said

at 10:27 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Jayne Eyre
Jayne Eyre was my least favorite of the two books. While It was faster paced and an easier read, I found it to be dull and dreary. When I pictured scenes from the novel I always felt it would look grey and dead. I felt that the author used a lot of unnecessary description of the surroundings (sorry thought of the wrong book in last comment). And while the book was easier to read and faster paced I found many happenings in the novel to be repetitive. It seemed to me things would start out rough fore Jane then slowly get better, when all of a sudden there is a pit fall in the sequence and she moves on to another time in her life and the cycle begins again.

Lindsay Perry said

at 10:41 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Wuthering Heights:
I definitely enjoyed Jane Eyre way more than I did this book. At the beginning I felt like all the characters were being thrown out and that to me was very confusing and made it harder for me to keep the up with the story. Like a lot of the characters had similar names and it would get really frustrating. I feel like when I read Jane Eyre I was always left guessing what would happen next, but with this book it was kind of predictable what was going to happen. One thing I did like about the book was the characters. Once I actually understood who was who I felt like the characters were very mysterious, but in a good way. I didn't really like Heathcliff at all, he was a very dark person. I feel as if he felt that because he was treated badly, he had to treat everyone else the same. This book was alright, but definitely not my favorite.

Austin Williams said

at 10:42 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Jane Eyre

I enjoyed Jane Eyre, but I found the ending somewhat predictable. I liked how the book took me on a journey through her entire life because I felt I could understand and connect with her character much better. What kept me intrigued was the time period the book took place. I liked seeing Jane and Mr. Rochester's relationship develop because it was much different then anything I had ever read before. This book made me feel many different emotions from extremely mad to very happy. I enjoyed that the book had a happy ending but everyone reading this book new the moment Jane left Thornfield the second time that she and Mr. Rochester would meet again . Overall I really enjoyed this book.

Zachary Massengill said

at 6:49 pm on Aug 26, 2013

Yes Austin i completely agree. This book was way to predictable and i guessed pretty much everything that was going to happen except for Bertha burning the house down and him losing his vision and arm.

Dante' said

at 10:48 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Jane Eyre

In my opinion, Jane Eyre would be a far more interesting novel if it were condensed and excluded some of the unnecessary background. I thought the plot of Jane Eyre had the potential to be captivating, but it was drawn out to the point of boredom. Personally, I did not care for the almost marriage to the cousin portion but I guess that is because we do not live in the Deep South. Although this love story was somewhat predictable, I thought Mr. Rochester only regaining sight in one eye made for a happy but more realistic ending; it was refreshing for the ending to not be too dramatic. My least favorite part of the book was the beginning because I feel the sad childhood story could have been condensed into one or two chapters. In my opinion, when you harp on a somber and depressing narrative for too long, the happy ending no longer matters. After finishing the book, I felt like this was more of a sad story. Overall, I vote we split this book into two parts to keep the reader conscious and to prevent excruciating boredom that is currently unavoidable.

Nicole Radford said

at 8:27 pm on Aug 26, 2013

Dante',
I completely agree that Jane Eyre would have been much more enjoyable if some of the unnecessary facts had been left out. I often thought that the main plot was interesting but it was lost in descriptions that did not aid the story.

Kaite77 said

at 10:52 pm on Aug 25, 2013

WUTHERING HEIGHTS
*SPOILER ALERT*
Throughout the book, Heathcliff was not my favorite character , but he was the most interesting. I didn’t think his character, his true character, changed much until the very end. When he stayed at Wuthering Heights with Hindley and visited Catherine before she died, the way he treated Linton and Hindley was just a means as to get what he wanted. Just like when he blackmailed Hindley into giving him the horse he wanted when he was little. I think the only time that he was not deceitful in character was when he spent time with Catherine. I think that he truly did love her. I just hated how he manipulated so many of the characters, like his son, to the point where he owned both Thrushcross Grange and Wuthering Heights. I did like how towards the end where he talked about not wanting to take revenge on Catherine’s and Linton’s family any more. Also I thought it was decent of him to not abuse Hareton like Hareton’s father abused Heathcliff. However I thought it was absolutely horrible that he turned him into a dull, ignorant creature. In a way, I pitied Heathcliff for his situation, but his actions as he grew older made me not pity him as much anymore.

Kaite77 said

at 10:54 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Wuthering Heights

*SPOILER ALERT*
“He's more myself than I am. Whatever our souls are made of, his and mine are the same.” This was probably my favorite line out of the entire book. Catherine was not my favorite character though, she is probably my least favorite. I feel like she was just a really selfish person and took advantage of those who loved her. She basically married Linton for his status and his money instead of marrying Heathcliff just because Heathcliff was poor. When she was courting Linton, she ended up blowing off Heathcliff for Linton’s company despite the fact that that would have been one of the few times that she could just spend time with Heathcliff. I felt that she could be so terribly strong willed at times while so terribly weak at others. Overall, I thought the book dragged on and didn’t really interest me as much as Jane Eyre did. I did love the ending though where Hareton and the young Catherine became a couple. That I didn’t really expect because of Catherine’s original treatment of him and her disowning him as a cousin.

Kaite77 said

at 10:55 pm on Aug 25, 2013

JANE EYRE





*SPOILER ALERT*
Okay, so something I wondered for a little while as I read this book was how did she not question there being a monster of some sort in the house? (Who did turn out to be a human) You think she would have thought that if he did not fire Grace then there would have been someone else doing the crazy things in the house. She saw Mr. Mason bitten and stabbed, something that would stay in my mind and I would have immediately questioned Mr. Rochester or left the house in fear of my life. Especially if on the morning of my wedding if some sort of monster actually came in my room and tore up my veil I’d take that as a cue to not get married and leave until whatever it was, was gone. Something else I didn’t quite understand was why did his crazy wife not attack Grace or kill her? I just don’t understand how they could co exist all the time and when Grace was asleep why did she not kill her? Especially since by the house fire, she was clearly capable of killing people.

Kathy Proctor said

at 9:36 pm on Aug 28, 2013

Bertha was probably restrained whenever she was hard to handle, and Grace was usually drunk and laid back, thus not someone that would agitate Bertha too much. :)

Kaite77 said

at 10:56 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Jane Eyre
*SPOILER ALERT*

Out of the two books, Jane Eyre was definitely my favorite. Despite taking me longer to read it, I thoroughly enjoyed it so much more. I thought the plot twists were fantastic, such as Mr. Rochester’s wife and Jane being related to St. John and her inheriting a fortune. The fortune didn’t surprise me as much as the others did but I loved that she and Mr. Rochester did eventually marry. People say that when you’re trying to find someone to date, then looks shouldn’t matter and most people still take looks into account. Even though Mr. Rochester was not handsome and Jane was deemed plain, they loved each other and truly loved each other for the person that they were and not what they looked like. I absolutely loved that aspect of the book, as well that Mr. Rochester wanted to marry Jane despite her being just a governess and possessing no fortune of her own. Also, I love this quote “I am no bird; and no net ensnares me: I am a free human being with an independent will.” I feel like this describes Jane very well, because she was independent in spirit and eventually independent on her own when she had been dependent on others most of her life

Alex Cauley said

at 11:01 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Jane Eyre:
*spoiler alert*
While this book was significantly longer in pages than Wuthering Heights, I found it to much more of a page turner. As the story of Jane's life progressed, I found myself becoming more and more a part of the story. I found that the treatment of Jane as a child, and her troubled adolescence inclined me to root for her, per say, as she grew into a young woman. I was proud as she turned her life around at Lowood, and even more so, when she got a job on her own and left. I predicted the love of Mr. Rochester and Jane, as soon as they were introduced, after reading and picturing their fond and rather flirty relationship they had during their evening talks, even in the beginning. I found myself becoming emotionally attached to their relationship, as he seemed to fall in love with Ms. Ingram. I felt that the suspense was built beautifully throughout the story, and when Mr. Rochester finally confessed his love, it was such a relief. The Victorian language of the novel is quite difficult at times to understand, but I felt it only enhanced the love story and made it almost enchanting. The one thing that did frustrate me about Jane, however, was her continuous indignation towards Mr. Rochester, after the engagement. It was quite refreshing to me, at first, that she was protecting herself and showing her feminine independence, but as it became more aware to me how much he loved her, I don't see how she did not swoon at his words. My favorite quote from Mr. Rochester was the following, as he proposed to Jane: "Come to me — come to me entirely now," said he; and added, in his deepest tone, speaking in my ear as his cheek was laid on mine, "Make my happiness — I will make yours."

Thomas Smith said

at 4:24 pm on Aug 26, 2013

Alex,

I agree with this in its entirety. It was by far the superior book because of its ability to capture the reader and pull them into the story. Seeing Jane progress from her adolescent into becoming the proper, kindhearted women she ended as. I found myself at times trying to guess what would happen next to Jane during her adventure. This kept me turning the pages and entranced in the book. I also agree with your thoughts on Jane. It frustrated me the way she acted towards Mr. Rochester towards the end of her stay at Thornfield. I, at times, found myself talking aloud in frustration as Jane denied Mr. Rochester's love even after his sincere apology, explanation, and confession of love. This quote by Edward Rochester came before his departure for the social gathering he attended, but it spoke volumes of his love for Jane: “I knew you would do me good in some way, at some time; – I saw it in your eyes when I first beheld you: their expression and smile did not – did not strike delight to my very inmost heart so for nothing. People talk of natural sympathies: I have heard of good genii: – there are grains of truth in the wildest fable. My cherished preserver, good-night!”

Kathy Proctor said

at 7:59 am on Aug 27, 2013

Your reply should show up under that person's initial response. Be sure to click "reply" when you are responding to an individual.

Kathy Proctor said

at 9:30 pm on Aug 28, 2013

Excellent details, Thomas! Edward definitely thought Jane would "save" him.

Austin Williams said

at 4:46 pm on Aug 26, 2013

Alex,

I totally agree that this book was a page turner and i felt the same way about becoming apart of her life. Because the book had so much detail, I was able to easily put myself in Jane's shoes. I also feel that the treatment she was given as a child helped push her harder to succeed on her own as she grew into a women.

Dante' said

at 11:07 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Wuthering Heights

This book was too much for me. I read this right after Jane Eyre, so I wasn't emotionally ready for this book to begin with. I strongly believe that simplicity is the key when it comes to writing. There is entirely too much going on in this book for me to enjoy it. The character of Heathcliff intrigues me. I believe there is a very important example of how awful people can act and the things they are capable of when they choose not to forgive others. However, there is also another important lesson in this novel. I think the message is, we must be careful of how we treat people because the level of revenge and retribution are determined by the victim. Hindley Earnshaw's treatment of Heathcliff gave Heathcliff a reason to seek revenge. Again, can we split the book up into two parts? I felt like there was just too much going on for me to enjoy what I was reading.

Lindsey Rhyne said

at 3:17 pm on Aug 26, 2013

Dante,

I also read Wuthering Heights after Jane Eyre and I favored it much more; Jane Eyre was just too typical a love story for me to really appreciate. Yes-- it was cute and had a happy ending, but I prefer books that build suspense and make you a part of them by constantly foreshadowing to yourself as to what will happen next. While I read Wuthering Heights, I found myself becoming a part of the novel and really visualizing every detail which made it a lot more enjoyable. I also disagree with your view on writing. I much appreciated the Bronte sister's style writing (except Joseph's dialect), mainly because I felt really smart when I understood what was going on hehe

Amber Hawley said

at 9:54 pm on Aug 26, 2013

I actually enjoyed Wuthering Heights a lot more than Jane Eyre. I loved how there was such precise detail included. It gave me a better understanding of the time period and overall setting of the story. Heathcliff, I felt, was a very stubborn character and ended up being my least favorite, even though I was on his side in the beginning of the book.

Dakota Long said

at 10:07 pm on Aug 26, 2013

I agree with you to a point Dante, I definitely thought Wuthering Heights had too much going on at once but I don't believe simplicity is the key when it comes to writing. Heathcliff starts out as what I perceived as the 'good guy' at the beginning but over time I started to like him a little less. Then again I started to dislike many of the characters throughout the book the more I read into it.

Alex Cauley said

at 11:19 pm on Aug 25, 2013

Wuthering Heights:
*spoiler alert*
I found Wuthering Heights to be one of the most frustrating books I have ever read. I found that every time I got attached to a character, they were killed off! At the beginning, I was a Heathcliff supporter, all the way, but as the story progressed, I found myself starting to hate him. As his true colors began to show, his love for Catherine no longer became a sweet and beautiful thing, but a psychotic and animal obsession. In his defense, however, all of the characters were a little wishy-washy, which would explain his anger. Linton was jubilant with little Catherine one minute, and depressed in his chambers the next and it was very hard to keep up with. I think Catherine being afraid to show her true love and feelings for Heathcliff may have been what made him go crazy, also. It was not a secret that she loved him, because from childhood, she spent every moment she could with him, but she even said herself it would "degrade" her to marry Heathcliff. I began to lose respect for her from that point on. She not only made herself miserable, but Heathcliff, her daughter, and Linton, as well. Poor little Catherine was stuck in the middle of a ruthless Heathcliff and miserable Linton. I do believe there is significance in this. I think that Heathcliff's obsession with wanting little Catherine to be close to his son was because of his desire to want to still be with her mother, and he would do anything to have that. On the other side, I think that Linton's desire to keep her away from Heathcliff's son was a representation of his need to keep her mother away from Heathcliff so she could not leave their marriage. He was always unsure and not confident, and I feel did not know how to use his words to truly express how he felt.

Kathy Proctor said

at 9:32 pm on Aug 28, 2013

Nice use of supporting details, Alex.

Jason Howe said

at 2:56 pm on Aug 26, 2013

Hunter
I agree with everything you said on your post about Wuthering Heights except for it being your favorite out of the two books. I also found Heathcliff an interesting character and found his actions understandable. They were understandable because he did them out of his love for Cathy. Without Heathcliff Wuthering Heights would have been unbearable. I liked Jane Eyre more simply because it was easier to read. Yes, Wuthering Heights had more twists but Jane Eyre was much easier to comprehend and follow.

Dante' said

at 3:42 pm on Aug 26, 2013

Thomas,
Mr. Rochester was also my favorite character in Jane Eyre. I found him to be intelligent but quite elusive in his thoughts. In my opinion, he acted as if he knew he was an intelligent man. My favorite scene from Mr. Rochester was when he portrayed himself as the gypsy. During this portion of the novel, Mr. Rochester shows he can read Jane quite well and that he understands the feelings that she has. Mr. Rochester, although a bit underhanded in his handling of his prior marriage, was definitely my favorite character.

Rachel Hamblin said

at 10:01 pm on Aug 26, 2013

Alex, I agree the book was a page turner and the details definitely helped me relate to the story. Jane Eyre was my favorite for being so much easier to understand than Wuthering Heights. I too predicted the love affair between Rochester and Jane from the beginning!

Aerial Alston said

at 7:49 am on Aug 27, 2013

Maxwell, I completely agree woth what you said about Jane Eyre being uneventful. It seemed as if EVERYTHING in her life at forst went wrong which was rodiculous since she was 10 years old. And Cinderella was a great comparison! I thought one of the servants had set the room on fire and stabbed Mr. Mason which kept the plot suspenseful. Overall I think it was a good book as well, just with such a slow progression.

Maggie Daynes said

at 8:18 am on Aug 27, 2013

Aerial,
I agree that a Bronte sister collaboration would be awesome. Jane Eyre was boring because it was like reading a journal, however the other characters were very interesting. Wuthering Heights was more interesting, but I felt like the over-arching theme was more simple

Maggie Daynes said

at 8:19 am on Aug 27, 2013

Aerial,
I agree that a Bronte sister collaboration would be awesome. Jane Eyre was boring because it was like reading a journal, however the other characters were very interesting. Wuthering Heights was more interesting, but I felt like the over-arching theme was more simple

Jacob VanLandingham said

at 4:46 pm on Aug 27, 2013

Jane Eyre
This was a very well written book but I still had problems with it. The whole part of the book before Jane went off to school and a lot of her early life was way too long and some of it was unnecessary. Also, some of it was hard to understand at first but that wasn't really a big deal. I also don't like how most of it, like the end, was predictable; but it did have some aspects that were extremely unpredictable, like the drama with Mr. Rochester's wife, that I really enjoyed. I also really liked the characters Mr. Rochester and Helen Burns for what they did for the story but I HATED Mrs. Reed and her daughters. Overall, I thought it was an extremely well written book, with a very interesting, but a tad drawn out story line.

Hunter Cockrell said

at 1:23 pm on Aug 30, 2013

Phillip,

I agree with you. Heathcliff accomplished his goal of revenge. His manipulative and cruel treatment of others allowed him to have his revenge. This treatment did not fill the void in his heart that Catherine left though. Also i see what you are saying about Lockwood. For him to be so curious, we really didn't get to know his character.

You don't have permission to comment on this page.